TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: RE : More usage: "Open" or "Access" web addresses
Subject:Re: RE : More usage: "Open" or "Access" web addresses From:Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com> To:"Leonard C. Porrello" <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com> Date:Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:03:59 -0700
Leonard C. Porrello wrote:
> Exactly. And it's the goal of writing so as not to disrupt the suspension
> of disbelief that makes technical writing interesting.
YOW!! Suddenly I find myself walking on eggshells. In hobnail boots.
This VR nneds some getting adjustment, but it *is* kind of fun.
>The fragility of the metaphor and the shallowness of the suspension of disbelief are intriguing.
My mind, after years of disappointment in the fragile, shallow, and
sometimes stale metaphors, has symbolized the whole lash-up as 'damned
low-bidder crap to work with,'
What kind of things intrigue? The first thing to mind is ideas
(intrigued by an idea). Then I think of the senses (the smell of
intrigue, or indeed, an intriguing visual or linguistic metaphor).
Perhaps my implying the existence of a sense of language is going too
far, but here it is anyway, a genny-wine unexpurgated Ed Wordsmith
endorsement that tech writing is spooky compared to the usual HR
understanding of it as 'arranging shallow, fragile metaphors into
cut-n-dried procedures.'
Anyway, my job description is :-)
Have fun,
Ned Bedinger
doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ned Bedinger [mailto:doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com]
>
> Leonard C. Porrello wrote:
>> Some argue that all language is metaphor.
>> In fact, it's not dificult to argue that "click" itself is metaphorical.
>> One doesn't click. The "mouse" clicks. To be strictly literal,
>> you'd have to say, "apply pressure to the left-most button on the top
>> of the mouse until you hear a 'click', then release the button."
>> Of course, this begs the question, "does a tree falling in a forest
>> make a noise if there is no one to hear it?" In other words, "does
>> the mouse really 'click', or is the 'click' merely just a human mental
>> construct?"
>
> Fortunately, what does matter to language is the mental construct.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-