TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: XML content management systems From:Yaakov Gelber <yaacovg2007 -at- hotmail -dot- com> To:Lech Rzedzicki <xchaotic -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Mon, 12 May 2008 10:39:04 -0400
Thanks. I will do some more home work.
Yaacovg
> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 15:29:49 +0100> From: xchaotic -at- gmail -dot- com> To: yaacovg2007 -at- hotmail -dot- com> Subject: Re: XML content management systems> CC: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> > In that case I don't think SharePoint is likely to fulfill those requirements.> > As a first step, I think, you might need to change your authoring> environment. Any variations of Word products may produce consistently> styled conent, but it's simply to easy to stray from there, even> unintentionally. Also Word's native OOXML format is difficult to work> with (th specification spanning thousands of pages, arguably not XML> in some places).> Switching to a more suitable format such as DITA, encourages reuse by> default and is becoming the de facto standard for tech writing> departments. Through specialization, you may adapt DITA to suit your> particular needs.> > I personally had to work with processes where Word format was the> desired output (due to it being widespread), it worked well as a> presentation tool. Any attempt to merge the changes from Word to the> CMS is in my view a risky attempt.> > As for XML-based CMS, there really is a lot of them out there. I> suggest reading STC Intercom edition devoted to planning and choosing> a CMS implementation.> > Then maybe http://cmswatch.com/, just to see the plethora of solution> on the market.> > There really is a lot of factors to ponder upon, technical,> managerial, philosophical.> > For instance, for any large enough repository, scalability and> performance become issues - if your writers are used to editing> offline, performance of many CMSes might be noticeably slow.> > Workflows only makes sense if they are well-designed and integrated> with the tools. I think this is one particular are where Sharepoint> excels - you can use use API to program custom workflows. In my> experience, I find it much more difficult for the management to use &> grasp the ideas of CMS than writers themselves.> > Almost every time, you need to customize the CMS solution to you> needs, you need to ensure that it's configurable enough (many CMSes> don't expose APIs for crucial functions so you're stuck with default> behavior) and that you have the resources to do so (in-house full-time> programmer ?).> > From the plethora of choices I see two ends of the spectrum:> a) small, usually open-source solutions, usually adapting existing> tech such as wikis, DITA OT, SVN, exist to form a basic CMS> b) huge players, Microsoft, PTC, IBM than can provide end-to-end> solutions (editor + database + workflows + nice GUI).> For instance in case of PTC that would be Epic Editor + XHive XML DB +> Documentum as a sample configuration.> > > It really is becoming a huge field as almost every company needs to> manage their knowledge and assets via some form of CMS.> The right choice can only be made knowing the specific use cases. An> that is only the beginning of the road, it needs to be followed by a> well-governed implementation and migration, followed by user training> and careful maintenance, including but not limited to managing the> reusable content.> > Lech
_________________________________________________________________
Make Windows Vista more reliable and secure with Windows Vista Service Pack 1. http://www.windowsvista.com/SP1?WT.mc_id=hotmailvistasp1banner
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-