TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I accidentally replied only to the author rather than the list. I'm
forwarding the thread to the list.
> > > [TJ] "Click Gimfratz, then click the display to add new
> > > locations." If the two independent clauses are short, you
> > > can use a comma rather than a semicolon.
> > > It's a gray area here.
> > >
> >
> >
> > [BG] Not for an editor, it isn't. Two independent clauses
> > need semicolons to
> > separate them -- or a conjunction.
> >
> >
> > [TJ] I admit that using a comma between two short independent
> > clauses is an exception to the rule, but it is permissible
> > according to Strunk and White. See
> > http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html. Scroll to the last
> > example for #5. "Man proposes, God disposes." Where do you
> > draw the line and require a semicolon rather than a comma?
> > That's the gray area.
> >
>
> [BG] Yes, your're right, but that's a more, shall we say, poetic usage that
> wouldn't be appropriate for business.
>
> > [TJ] Also note that two short independent clauses separated by a
> > coordinating conjunction don't always require a comma. For
> > example, "Timothy played the guitar and Betty sang." See The
> > Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition, section 6.32.
> >
> >
> >
>
> [BG] Yes, this is OK too. : )
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > [TJ] "Click Gimfratz, and then click the display to add new
> > > locations." In this style, the comma after Gimfratz is
> > > allowed because the two independent clauses are implied.
> > > [You] click Gimfratz, and then [you] click the display to add
> > > new locations.
> > >
> >
> >
> > [BG] It's not allowed -- it's required.
> >
> >
> > [TJ] Maybe a better example sentence would make the issue more
> > apparent -- "Click the Print button and select OK." The "you"
> > is implied, but couldn't it also pass as a compound
> > predicate? I could be saying "[You] click the Print button,
> > and [you] select OK." Or I could be listing two verbs,
> > similar to the sentence, "He clicked the Print button and
> > selected OK." I've seen both styles used in manuals. I've
> > love to see a reference cited on this one.
> >
> >
>
> [BG] All the examples above are correct. "Click the Print button and select
> OK"
> seems to me to be a compound predicate. If you repeat the subject, you do
> need that comma (normally, but not in the "and Betty sang" sentence. In
> that, either with or without is fine.
>
> [BG] This only went to me, so if you want to post it online, please feel
> free to
> do so.
>
> Sorry if I came down a bit hard on you, Tom. ; )
>
>
> Bonnie Granat
>http://www.GranatEdit.com
>
>
>
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial. http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-