TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Hiring, but it's a secret? From:Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:18:31 -0800
voxwoman wrote:
>> Voxwoman intoned:
> In my case, I try very hard to find out the name of the company from the
> first recruiter.
Try to get the name and the employer's unique identifier (usually a
number) that identifies each of their vacancy announcement. Ask each
recruiter who calls to givce you the employer name AND their
announcement number. Then you can compare the number to any vacancy
announcement numbers you've authorized your resume to be submitted for.
If you do this long enough, you'll arrive at a happy day when you rise
above the recruiting fog to discover more than one unique announcement
for similar or identical jobs. Hot diggity, you can submit yer resume
for both.
I've seen this several times, but as often as not, they turn out not to
be twin job vacancies, but the result of the employer withdrawing one
announcement and then re-announcing the position a month later, with a
new number. This kind of thing is good to catch, if only for the
experience of having the recruiter marvel at how organized you are. At
that point, you've got the recruiter's attention, and you can spend a
half hour of quality time, picking their brains, They'll tell you just
about anything you'd care to know :-)
> I have, in the past, received dozens of calls from different recruiters for
> the same job.
>
> I believe the etiquette is the first person who submits you "owns" you.
But advise every recruiter you talk to that your resume is NOT to be
submitted without your OK. They hate it because hot jobs move fast, and
getting in touch with contractors can take hours or days, and worse
still, some employers stop accepting resumes once they get their quota.
Still, as far as I'm concerned, every recruiter interested in submitting
me needs to check with me first, every time.
Of course, you can establish whatever policy you want your recuiter to
follow, but having that control over who "owns" you seems like the
sensible way to go, IMHO. This is nothing new, but some agencies and
recruiters need reminding.
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-