TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
We have a first release of a new piece of software due out in a couple of weeks.
There is a peripheral module that was added on at the last minute that is what you might call incomplete in that I can add stuff in this module but I cannot yet remove it. I'll be able to remove it in a future release, most likely the next one.
My question is about whether I should document that at the minute you cannot remove these things.
I think I should because:
* if I was a user and I tried to remove these things and spent time and energy trying to figure out how and even reading the doc to find out how I'd be more than a little annoyed that it wasn't documented. This is a bad user experience in many respects and extremely damaging to their perception of the usefulness of the doc.
* I like to think I provide user assistance. I should therefore assist my users as best I can. If I was training a user in this module I'm certain I'd mention that at the minute these things can't be deleted.
I think I shouldn't because:
* it's a very peripheral module -- few will use it
* most users of this release will be pre-sales. This potentially means they will likely read the doc more to get a measure of what the software does than a 'real' user who will likely read the bits they need to.
* most users will be using the doc in a very hand-held (by us) environment. There should be few, if any, customers trying to go it alone.
* it's just plain embarrassing that it's not there.
* my colleagues mostly think I shouldn't.
This software is in no way dangerous, mission critical or anything else where threat of legal action trumps other concerns.
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
Thanks
VC
_________________________________________________________________
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com
Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at: http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-