RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the recordbooks...

Subject: RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the recordbooks...
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:49:19 -0400

In this particular case, the FDA is right. It might not be obvious to a
non-native speaker that peanut brittle contains peanuts, whereas bear
claw pastries don't contain bear claws.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Connie Giordano
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:40 PM
> To: 'Heather Anderson'; 'TECHWR-L'
> Subject: RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for
> the recordbooks...
>
> In the US, all packaged foods that contain peanuts, peanut
> oil or peanut byproducts MUST state it on the label. The FDA
> doesn't make exceptions because the word is in the product
> name. It may seem unnecessary, but it's designed to ensure
> that all products provide consistent label information.
>


This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the record books...: From: Pro TechWriter
Re: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the record books...: From: Janice Gelb
RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the recordbooks...: From: Leonard C. Porrello
RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the recordbooks...: From: Heather Anderson
RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the recordbooks...: From: Connie Giordano

Previous by Author: RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for therecord books...
Next by Author: Re: Semantic(s)
Previous by Thread: RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the recordbooks...
Next by Thread: RE: OFT: But close to Re: Another warning label for the recordbooks...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads