TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Certification: Ernest and Scribbler From:"McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> To:Wade Courtney <wade -dot- courtney -at- gmail -dot- com>, Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:28:43 -0400
Wade Courtney wrote:
> Well, so far whether or not I am a good technical writer has been the
> subjective opinion of someone else. As with many other
> certifications, just
> because a person has one, doesn't mean they are any good.
> There are a number
> of doctors, lawyers, mechanics, and various other careers that have
> certifications, yet there are many of those same people who I
> wouldn't let
> touch me or my car.
>
> We could do what law enforcement does. Along with the skills
> part of being a
> tech writer (writing, tool knowledge, English knowledge)
> maybe we should
> include a psychological evaluation in front of a panel of experts to
> determine if we have the personality to be tech writers.
Perhaps TWs should have live-fire exercises and top-/c/o/p/-scribe
competitions.
You get dinged for each "bad guy" that you miss, and for
each innocent bystander that you hit.
In the elimination round, two (or more) TWs are tossed into
the maze from different directions, each dressed such that
the other(s) recognize her/him as "bad guy". Live rounds
are used, of course.
The competitions would take place every three years, and
the outcome (who won, who lost) would influence the traits
that were tested and valued in the certification testing.
Sure, there are flaws in that model, but would it be any
less effective or entertaining than the model whereby
sit-down tests are devised and administered by bureau'rats
driven by politicians?
- Kevin
(Hands up, anybody who believes a certification program
would NOT become controlled by people whose primary
leanings and strengths and motivations are political.)
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-