TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Subject: Re: New doc group: FrameMaker or Flare? From:David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:25:13 +0200
One thing I haven't noticed so far: what kind of output do they desire?
If either printed or .pdf, whether to use Frame would seem to me to
depend upon their willingness to engage a documentation professional
on contract each time they need to produce a deliverable. In my
experience, the incredible mess that is made by inexperienced people
doing successive generations of edits and updates on Frame docs must
truly be seen to be believed. To this day, I shudder when I think of
some of the docs I inherited like this on a contract with Nortel over
a decade ago. Format overrides alone were a nightmare when attempting
to get a clean result in an upgrade on one of these things.
Thus, for printed or .pdf manuals I would suggest another tool
entirely. The suggestion to try OpenOffice.org (or its upcoming fork
called LibreOffice) is actually quite a good one; in my experience,
there are some advantages it presents over Word, for example.
Otherwise, I'd suggest sticking pretty much with the word processing
app of choice in the company--although if it's Word I would definitely
create some canonical templates and be sure there are copies on some
sort of write-protected media so the untutored could not begin the
wild series of changes that seem to accompany a document passing
through many hands which belong to the less-skilled types.
It's too bad that creating the document templates would be so
difficult, for they sound like a wonderful candidate for LyX, since
that makes doc creation a breeze but makes it incredibly difficult to
try to mess up the doc template.
If they will want context-sensitive help, that is obviously another
matter. I haven't used Doc-to-Help personally, but I understand that
it has about the lowest learning curve in the business and thus may be
a fine choice.
David
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-