TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
POD localization and targeting pubs for reproduction; was: Re: recommendations for Print on Demand vendors
Subject:POD localization and targeting pubs for reproduction; was: Re: recommendations for Print on Demand vendors From:David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:54:38 +0200
Stephen--
Another facet you may wish to consider: if you have substantial user
base outside the U.S., you might seriously consider finding POD
resources abroad. For instance, if you have customers in the E.U.,
having a vendor there will lower the costs and response time for them.
This is more convenient for your customers, of course, and it also may
increase the use of your printed docs correspondingly.
If you also happen to have docs in various languages, that is a natural
as well--to have the localized docs available locally as well.
I am somewhat familiar with POD regarding fiction and trade paperback
nonfiction, but unfortunately I've never been involved with any of them
for tech docs. A major concern of mine would be whether any of your docs
need to have color reproduction of any illustrations; secondarily,
whether any graphics are produced with an eye toward how well they might
reproduce in a monochrome Xerographic medium.
As you are aware, various colors can easily reproduce as similar shades
of gray when printed in black and white; this can result in
unfortunately difficult to use graphical figures.
Thus, I believe best practices would indicate that when you are
targeting this kind of reproduction you should carefully assess your
graphics, increasing contrast where necessary to be sure the output is
useful to the customer. In some cases, this can be somewhat of a PITP
(pain in the posterior), it can make a huge difference in the resulting
document's usefulness.
In those cases where the product itself may have serious impact on
health and safety (which I presume your products may?), striving for
maximum clarity would certainly seem to be significant in this regard.
David
On 03/15/2011 07:55 AM, techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com wrote:
We are moving from including printed manuals to letting the end user
either print out the included PDF or ordering a print manual from a POD
vendor. Does anyone have any experience and/or suggestions for vendors?
The vendor(s) would print and ship without our involvement.
Our current printing vendor dropped out of the business.
We've already surveyed out user base and majority use online
documentation only; remaining users said they were OK with POD.
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com