TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skeptical curmudgeonlyness, part II]
Subject:RE: Original work [was RE: STC certification program: skeptical curmudgeonlyness, part II] From:Steven Jong <stevefjong -at- comcast -dot- net> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:43:06 -0400
Lynne Wright extolled the virtues of "being able to discuss your work intelligently and coherently, off the cuff, in a person-to-person situation such as an interview." I agree. I know enough to ask a candidate about a sample's backstory. But lots of people who have interviewed me over the years do not. Everyone interviews differently, and I sense a lot of personal pride in hiring managers describing their individual techniques here. Interviewing is—dare I say it?—artisanal.
One of the strengths of the approach we are taking with certification is the requirement to provide commentaries on the samples provided. This directly forces applicants to discuss their work intelligently and coherently (if not off the cuff). In other fields such as education, this form of assessment is called "true assessment," because it requires an applicant to demonstrate not just the ability to do the work, but their understanding of the reasons for doing the work that way. And, by the way, it's a standard method we're applying equally to everyone.
I'm not trying to suggest to hiring managers that the certification process is better than, or can replace, a face-to-face interview by a skilled interviewer. But you're not asking as much as we are. And if you are engaging technical communicators indirectly, as through a third party, you're not interviewing at all.
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-