TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: STC certification: what's in it for tech writers?
Subject:Re: STC certification: what's in it for tech writers? From:Steven Jong <stevefjong -at- comcast -dot- net> To:janice -dot- gelb -at- oracle -dot- com, TECHWR-L Digest <TECHWR-L -at- LISTS -dot- TECHWR-L -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:14:06 -0400
Janice Gelb wrote:
> My issue, I guess, is that if the certification is too broad, I
> wonder how meaningful it can be; if it's not broad enough, it
> won't be applicable to many aspects of our field. Seems to
> me that if I were an employer, I would rather have someone
> with knowledge in my field and/or experience with my working
> environment than someone with an overly broad or generic
> accreditation.
This certification is too broad; this certification isn't broad enough; we are working on making technical communication certification just right 8^)
Seriously, striking a balance has taken a lot of work by quite a few people, guided by experts who have told us that (a) every profession is filled with practitioners who think their work is unique and can't be generally described, but (b) whose work can be generally described in areas of practice, often similar to those of other professions. The structure we are erecting is a base certification with sub-certifications. We're starting with the base certification, because that is the only way you can do it.
I am not claiming that certification in any field is a substitute for domain-specific knowledge and experience, and I acknowledge that clients look for that first and weigh it heavily. What I do claim is that when we apply for a job, we are rarely, if ever, the one and only qualified candidate. Usually there are many candidates who qualify. (There days, "many" can be over 100 8^( Domain-specific knowledge is not enough. Given a large number of candidates, and when choosing between the few remaining candidates, certification is often a tiebreaker.
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-