TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Question for writers in New Zealand and Australia
Subject:RE: Question for writers in New Zealand and Australia From:<Brian -dot- Henderson -at- mitchell1 -dot- com> To:<Techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:56:54 -0800
Yes, absolutely your question needs to be asked, absent particular
knowledge about the region.
My point was only that assuming there WOULD be a problem is maybe not
justified.
(Although, I could easily be wrong about that. When it comes to humans
and their penchant for disliking "others", it's possible that trouble
might be more likely than not.)
-BH
-----Original Message----- From: Carla Martinek
Which is why my question is directed at the Kiwis and Aussies for their
input. :-)
As an American, it wouldn't bother me personally to see US/Canada/Mexico
lumped together, but as the translation coordinator of my company, I
understand that there are cultural implications elsewhere. Lumping Korea
and Japan together, for example, would generally not be a good regional
choice.
Too often "ignorant Americans" get it wrong when it comes to being
culturally sensitive when we go to or sell products elsewhere. My job
is to prevent such mishaps when I can.
> -----Original Message-----
> I'm not so sure about that, Julie. I don't think it would hardly
> register if I had to pick "U.S./Canada". Now, I would probably wonder
> about a "U.S./Mexico" grouping, but only because it's unusual to see
> them lumped together in anything other than a purely geographical
> context. But neither would bother me if there's a reason to combine
> them.
- CONFIDENTIAL-
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may
also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
may not review, use, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive
this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email
and then delete this email.