TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Question for writers in New Zealand and Australia
Subject:Re: Question for writers in New Zealand and Australia From:John G <john -at- garisons -dot- com> To:Techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:33:25 -0500
Why are you grouping countries together?
If it's language, then US, Canada, and Mexico would not belong together, If
it's sales region (North America) they might. If it's convenience, don't do
it at all - you will upset someone needlessly.
My 2¢
JG
> -----Original Message----- From: Carla Martinek
>
> Which is why my question is directed at the Kiwis and Aussies for their
> input. :-)
>
> As an American, it wouldn't bother me personally to see US/Canada/Mexico
> lumped together, but as the translation coordinator of my company, I
> understand that there are cultural implications elsewhere. Lumping Korea
> and Japan together, for example, would generally not be a good regional
> choice.
>
> Too often "ignorant Americans" get it wrong when it comes to being
> culturally sensitive when we go to or sell products elsewhere. My job
> is to prevent such mishaps when I can.
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I'm not so sure about that, Julie. I don't think it would hardly
> > register if I had to pick "U.S./Canada". Now, I would probably wonder
> > about a "U.S./Mexico" grouping, but only because it's unusual to see
> > them lumped together in anything other than a purely geographical
> > context. But neither would bother me if there's a reason to combine
> > them.
>
>
> - CONFIDENTIAL-
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may
> also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> may not review, use, copy, or distribute this message. If you receive
> this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email
> and then delete this email.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as john -at- garisons -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com