TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
Subject:Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication From:Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com> Date:Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:08:58 -0700
And you think that engineers have formulas that provide repeatable, valid
results for estimating the progress of design projects? Costs? Whether
the darned thing is going to work the first time?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> When we finally come up with a formula that provides repeatable valid
> results for estimating minutes per page to create a help system, then we
> can call ourselves engineers. [image: :D big grin]
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.