Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication

[Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com>]

That's another reason we shouldn't be considered real engineers.  We don't get to blow s**t up.  


________________________________
 From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com> 
Cc: Andrew Warren <awarren -at- synaptics -dot- com>; "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> 
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
 

And you think that engineers have formulas that provide repeatable, valid results for estimating the progress of design projects?  Costs?  Whether the darned thing is going to work the first time?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Z-3fjg4dYY 

Gene Kim-Eng



On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

When we finally come up with a formula that provides repeatable valid results for estimating minutes per page to create a help system, then we can call ourselves engineers. 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives