TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I used Flare 6 through 7.1. PDF output had a lot of bugs (particularly
regarding tables), supposedly many of those were fixed in version 8.
Named destinations were not supported until version 8, which meant
that you couldn't link to a particular topic in a PDF from another PDF
or web page, which was a dealbreaker for that particular job.
I had no problems at all with bitmapped screen shots once I figured
out that I had to use a third-party image editor to set the dpi.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Shawn C <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io> wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> You have to remember that VMware is pretty large and they use a whole lot
> of different tool in different departments. But I was curious, as well...
> before buying. I didn't get my own answer fast enough and discovered that
> if you search for MadCap, using VMware's website search function, it will
> list about 68 documents authored in MadCap Flare.
>
> What I observed in looking over different VMware documentation was:
>
> - MadCap Flare (v6) produces good results (except the VMware authors would
> have produced much better documentation if they had inserted .svg images
> instead of bitmap)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.
