TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
You're right, it's not *actually* consistent (even if it looks prettier).
Thanks Milan! (And Hannah who replied off-list.)
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Milan DavidoviÄ <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>wrote:
> On the other hand, if you made it consistent wouldn't you be
> introducing ambiguity (formatting something not to be clicked as
> something to be clicked)?
>
> --Milan DavidoviÄ
>
> Sent from my Yost 10
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Jen <jennee -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> > In this case, would AnotherFile.txt be in bold or Courier? You're not
> > supposed to click it, so it should be formatted like a regular file name
> > (<filename> in DocBook, which in my case is output as Courier), but then
> it
> > looks inconsistent
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.