TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
"You're expensive" translates into "Anyone can write."
One way around this is to get something an engineer/developer has written, and then rewrite it to be client-facing.
Then have a higher-up look at both and ask which document they'd rather place in front of a client.
If you still get the same answer, then they are simply not willing to pay for your services.
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Monique Semp
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 3:57 PM
To: Wright, Lynne <Lynne -dot- Wright -at- Kronos -dot- com>; Jody Zolli <jody -dot- zolli -at- gmail -dot- com>; TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Subject: Re: "Age-old" question
> We believe that our skills and experience are worth high-end salaries;
> but from the company's perspective, its better to hire somebody who
> will do an adequate job/improve as they go but who is willing to
> settle for significantly less in terms of salary and vacation time, etc.
Yes, precisely. Certainly/obviously age discrimination does exist. But I believe that many times it's our demands that are "the problem", not our age, per se. And this transcends age as "an issue" to all sorts of things, such as the basic need to even have a tech writer.
Anecdote time: A client told me recently that for a new product coming out, they're going to have the engineer write the docs. Clearly the client thinks that they'll get something good enough while saving $$ by not paying the tech writer. (Said client has recently started telling me at almost every in-person meetingâI typically work remotely with onsite visits every few weeksâthat "you're expensive.")
So if a company doesn't see the value we provide, it can be totally unrelated to our age, gender, etc. We all can argue 'til the cows come home that these are bad decisions for the company. But given how short-term the ROI must always be in this fast-paced business climate, companies don't really care if the long-term effect of poor docs is angry or lost customers.
None of the above is meant to discount the very real problems that experienced, 50+ old workers have with getting hired. And I wonder if this has always been the case or is significantly worse now than 20-30 years ago?
-Monique
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do not read, distribute or reproduce this transmission (including any attachments). If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or email reply.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com
