TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: IBM is having a Yahoo moment: No more working from home
Subject:Re: IBM is having a Yahoo moment: No more working from home From:Jody Zolli <jody -dot- zolli -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net> Date:Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:10:09 -0500
I wasn't at DEC early enough to know about turkey farms, but I was told
that they unintentionally created a policy that helped ensure they retained
underperformers.
I heard that, when an employee was deemed underperforming (I think you had
to get a 4 or 5 on your performance review), your manager was required to
bring up your performance a minimum of 3 before you could be transferred to
another department. I heard that many managers would give underperforming
employees a 4 in order to ensure they could be transferred to another
department, thus making the employee someone else's problem. I do recall
hearing that when the first round of layoffs came (the golden parachute /
most generous layoff package), many of the people who were let go probably
should have been let go long ago.
-Jody
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:50:43 -0500, Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- westnet -dot- com -dot- au>
> wrote:
>
> If cutting payroll really is the unstated goal ...
>>
>
> In ancient times Digital Equipment had a corporate "no layoffs" policy.
> They (most likely Ken Olsen himself) were trying very hard to be good guys.
> But of course you sometimes have to let a bunch of highly unproductive
> people go without having solid grounds for firing them. DEC's solution, or
> so I have heard? The Turkey Farm.
>
> You, targeted for removal, would be assigned to a new project with no
> manager, in an office with other turkeys, somewhere like in the fifth
> sub-basement of The Mill. You would have a phone and a subscription to a
> newspaper. (This was before any Internet.)
>
> Maybe the turkey farm was just a fabrication. I never worked at DEC, so I
> wouldn't know first hand. But it sure made a good story.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com