TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: What's your preference: One long page or several small pages?
Subject:Re: What's your preference: One long page or several small pages? From:John G <john -at- garisons -dot- com> To:"Wright, Lynne" <Lynne -dot- Wright -at- kronos -dot- com> Date:Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:31:56 -0400
A few other concerns:
- Several separate topics always seems to me as more confusing than one
long one.
- I see jumping around as an easy way of getting lost, or losing your
train of thought
- I think I have seen research that there's a fall-off in the % of users
who follow links
e.g. - 95% will go to #2, 90% of them to #3, 80% of them to #4 ...
My bias is showing ...
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 3:17 PM John G <john -at- garisons -dot- com> wrote:
> Hi Lynne,
>
> Thanks for asking me to clarify.
>
> - I'm talking about browser-based content (ours is created in
> Confluence, but any web presentation will apply).
> - A "screenload" is
> when I have to scroll down (or Page Down) to see what won't fit in the
> first screen of content.
> - Page = topic
> , so yes, one long topic vs. several small topics.
>
>
> JG
>
>
> -
> -
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 3:08 PM Wright, Lynne <Lynne -dot- Wright -at- kronos -dot- com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm confused about what you mean by a long vs short page, and also what
>> you mean by "screenload":
>>
>> If you're working in Word or Frame or other similar doc authoring tool,
>> are you talking about changing the page size to 8 1/2 x 14 or something?
>>
>> Or are you talking about topics in a help system, and you're wondering
>> whether to put the whole procedure in one topic, or break it into smaller
>> sub-topics?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>> <techwr-l-bounces+lynne -dot- wright=kronos -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> On Behalf
>> Of John G
>> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 2:59 PM
>> To: TechWhirl (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com) <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>> Subject: What's your preference: One long page or several small pages?
>>
>> Quick survey!
>>
>> I have several long-ish pages (5 or 6 screenloads) each of which contains
>> rather complex instructions to run a procedure.
>>
>> Is that better than spreading the same information across 5 or 6 short
>> pages -- assuming there's an intro/overview and links from each short page
>> to the previous and next pages?
>>
>> My arguments for long pages:
>>
>> - One long page is easy to bookmark
>> - PDFing is easy and fast an includes everything
>> - Easy to look back and ahead
>>
>> My arguments for short pages:
>>
>> - Less intimidating
>> - Easier to scan and read
>>
>> Your thoughts? And bonus points if you can cite user preferences and
>> reasons!
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> John Garison | Lead Technical Communicator | Medidata Solutions
>> 350 Hudson Street, 9th Floor. | New York, NY 10014 || 441 Blood Road,
>> Chester, VT 05143 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
>> and content development | http://techwhirl.com
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Lynne -dot- Wright -at- kronos -dot- com -dot-
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>>
>>
>> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
>> info.
>>
>> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
>> online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>>
>> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
>> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
>> and content development | http://techwhirl.com
>>
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as vwritert -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>>
>>
>> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
>> info.
>>
>> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
>> online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>>
>> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
>> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com