TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: OED From:Paul Trummel <trummel -at- U -dot- WASHINGTON -dot- EDU> Date:Thu, 3 Feb 1994 08:22:57 -0800
Thank you Tracey. At last we have some research rather than personal
opinion and experience!
Paul Trummel.
On Wed, 2 Feb 1994, Tracey Showalter wrote:
> OED
> Last night it became too much for me: Curiosity drove me to my OED to find the
> truth. After slogging through pages of tiny tiny text, I found no answer. But
I
> did find this:
> 1. 1883, G. Massey, Nat. Genesis
> Things were portrayed before thoughts by those who were thingers
> rather than thinkers.
> 2. Thing is an obs. form of Think, v1 and v2
> 3. in a use from 1420, "thing" is a 3rd pers sing form of "think"
> 4. Thing, dial or coll
> 1b nonce-use An idea, a thought
> 1867, G. McDonald, Home Again
> iv. A thing must be a think before it be a thing.
> 5. Think is an obs. form of Thing
> 6. spellings of thing dating from Old English vary |thing| with |think|
> (anybody know how to represent the IPA on the net??)
> i promise to say no more....
> Tracey Showalter
> tshowalt -at- sctcorp -dot- com
