TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

Threaded TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive February 1994

---

685 messages

Thread Index (Switch to Author Index)

---

• Re: A reply to a previous discussion, Don M Chaffee
• Re: Telecommuting, Ad absurdum per aspera
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[3]: Telecommuting, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Re[2]: Telecommuting, Jonathan Leer
  • Re: Re[3]: Telecommuting, Peg Mauer
  • Re: Re[3]: Telecommuting, Tom Parker [Consultant]
  • telecommuting, Anatole Wilson
  • Telecommuting, Margaret Gerard
• Somethink to thing about, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Somethink to thing about, Kaye Sykes
• Re: Framemaker 4, Helena Jerney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Framemaker 4, Margaret Gerard
  • Re: Framemaker 4, Matthew Wong
  • FrameMaker 4, Margaret Gerard
• Re: American Heritage Dictionary, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: American Heritage Dictionary, Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: American Heritage Dictionary, Arthur Comings
  • Re: American Heritage Dictionary, Nancy Hoft
  • Re: American Heritage Dictionary, Karen Kay
  • Re: American Heritage Dictionary, Stephen Bernhardt
• Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Karen Kay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Sue Stewart
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Craig Haggart, Accelerator Ops
  • Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Don M Chaffee
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Don M Chaffee
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Robert Bononno
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Don M Chaffee
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Don M Chaffee
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Don M Chaffee
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Mark Hagen
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Andrew Shires
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Charles P. Campbell
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!, Craig Haggart, Accelerator Ops
• Re: homophones, Shannon Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: homophones, Fred Wersan
• Re: thing, Shannon Ford
• Re: Origin of the AT Symbol, Paul David Marvel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Origin of the AT Symbol, Steve Fouts
• Re: judas priest song, Brett E Lee-1
• Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional), Sue Stewart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: think ..uh... thing coming (Regional), Charles P. Campbell
• Re: thin(g, k) survey, Brett E Lee-1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: thin(g, k) survey, MIke Mcpherson
  • Re: thin(g, k) survey, Brett E Lee-1
  • Re: thin(g, k) survey, Mary Ruth Michel
• Re: Another think coming, Brett E Lee-1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Another think coming, Sarah Mahoney
  • Re: Another think coming, Rowena Campbell
• STC competition judges, Randy Allen Harris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: STC competition judges, technicalwriter
  • Re: STC competition judges, Ann Balaban
  • Re: STC competition judges, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: STC competition judges, Pam Tatge
• Re: Style Guides?, Jim Grey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Style Guides?, Jim Grey
  • Re: Style Guides?, Don M Chaffee
• Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte" & think vs thing, Brian Daley
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 30 Jan 1994 to 31 Jan 1994, nancy ott
• HTML, David McMurrey IBM
• FYI: Asst/Assoc Prof & Director of Tech Comm Position, Johndan Eilola
• Loco doco, lpraderio
• Re[2]: TECHNICAL, ACADEMIC: use or not use `we', lpraderio
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECHNICAL, ACADEMIC: use or not use `we', Joe Fockler
  • Re: Re[2]: TECHNICAL, ACADEMIC: use or not use `we', Karen Kay
  • Re[4]: TECHNICAL, ACADEMIC: use or not use `we', lpraderio
• Technical Writing Positions - Where Are Listings?, Bell, Roger
• Re: STC competition, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: STC competition, John Weiland
  • Re: STC competition, Marian Harry-Young
  • Re: STC competition, Nancy Hoft
• use of the word "appears", mpriestley
• use of the word "invokes", mpriestley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Laura Lemay
  • use of the word "invokes", Steve Owens
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Sue Stewart
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Len Olszewski
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Karen Kay
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: use of the word "invokes", Jerold Jeansonne
• Re: malapropisms, etc., Alun Whittaker
• Information Mapping, Sarah Mahoney
• Summary Graphics file conversion, Eric Muehling
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Summary Graphics file conversion, Brian Daley
• Re: STC Competitions, Dianne Phelan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: STC Competitions, Helena Jerney
  • Re[2]: STC Competitions, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: STC Competitions, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: STC Competitions, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: Re[2]: STC Competitions, Tom Hoyt
• Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte", Chad Hill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pronouncing "gigabyte", Bonnie Nestor (NESTORM -at- FEDC04 -dot- FED -dot- ORNL -dot- GOV
• Re: STC competition judges with a usability bent, Brian Daley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: STC competition judges with a usability bent, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: STC competition judges with a usability bent, Kathleen L. Root
  • Re: Re[2]: STC competition judges with a usability bent, Sue Stewart
• Windows Help Training ?, Matthew Wong
• No need to mention the actor?, Arthur Comings
• Predicting the Future of TC, Susan Mitchell
• invocations, mpriestley
• STC Competitions - evaluating usability, Laura Zupko
• Judging the judges (STC pubs/art/video competitions), Ken d'Albenas
• Judge training, LaVonna Funkhouser
• "Seed crystals" (was: "Regionalism" and "Another think coming"), Ken d'Albenas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Seed crystals" (was: "Regionalism" and "Another think coming"), Steve Owens
• Competitions, Mark Levinson
• TECHWR-L Digest - 12 Jan 1994 to 13 Jan 1994, genie-postmaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • TECHWR-L Digest - 12 Jan 1994 to 13 Jan 1994, genie-postmaster
• Usability Seminar, MIR
• History of "Think Globally, Act Locally", Nancy Hoft
• OED, Tracey Showalter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OED, Paul Trummel
• Clarification, Vollbach, Elizabeth
• ok, ROSE NORMAN, UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE
• Re: "Seed crystals" (was: "Regionalism" and "Another think c, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
• Re: "Seed crystals" (was: "Regionalism" and "Another think coming"), Andrea Magers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Seed crystals" (was: "Regionalism" and "Another think coming"), Len Olszewski
  • Re: "Seed crystals" (was: "Regionalism" and "Another think coming"), LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: "Seed crystals" (was: "Regionalism" and "Another think coming"), Jerold Jeansonne
• Magick, Steve Fouts
• Re: effete greco-romans, Tracey Showalter
• Competition Judging Session at 1994 STC Region 5 Conference, Binion Amerson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Competition Judging Session at 1994 STC Region 5 Conference, Ann Balaban
• Information from TECHWR-L Listowner, ejray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Information from TECHWR-L Listowner, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Re: Binion Amerson, Ann Balaban
• Re: What to say to people who LIKE the passive voice (fwd), M DeMeritt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What to say to people who LIKE the passive voice (fwd), Shannon Ford
  • Re: What to say to people who LIKE the passive voice (fwd), Kris Jaeger
  • Re: What to say to people who LIKE the passive voice (fwd), Sue Stewart
• Re: Seed crystals, Rowena Campbell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Seed crystals, Mark Levinson
• Defining Terms (Was Re: Judging manuals (by themselves)), Steve Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Defining Terms (Was Re: Judging manuals (by themselves)), Steve Owens
  • Re: Defining Terms (Was Re: Judging manuals (by themselves)), Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Defining Terms (Was Re: Judging manuals (by themselves)), Steve Owens
  • Re: Defining Terms (Was Re: Judging manuals (by themselves)), Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Commercial At, Mark Levinson
• While we're on the topic of words . . ., Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Len Olszewski
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Ann Amsler
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Fred Wersan
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Fred M Jacobson
  • Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Jane_Torpie_at_III-HQ
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Gary Dettmers
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Doug Montalbano
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Fred M Jacobson
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Laura Lemay
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Ann Amsler
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Ann Amsler
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Peg Mauer
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Fred M Jacobson
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Gary Dettmers
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Nancy Hoft
  • Re: Re[2]: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Sue Stewart
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Sue Stewart
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: While we're on the topic of words . . ., Stephen Bernhardt
• Re: Judging manuals (by themselves), Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Judging manuals (by themselves), Fred M Jacobson
  • Re: Judging manuals (by themselves), Mike Beyries
  • Re: Judging manuals (by themselves), Susan Fowler
• STC and volunteers, Kelly Hoffman
• Re[2]: What to say to people who LIKE the passive voice (fwd, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: What to say to people who LIKE the passive voice (fwd, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
• cmsg cancel <2ir2rc$nua -at- news -dot- u -dot- washington -dot- edu>, Edward Bedinger
• Hard G/ Soft G (was: Pronouncing "gigabyte"; TAKE A STAND!), Andrea Magers
• Re: The use of indicate, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The use of indicate, John Eldard
  • Re: The use of indicate, Charles Fisher
  • Re: The use of indicate, Susan Fowler
  • Re: The use of indicate, Len Olszewski
• Re[2]: Why not indicate?, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why not indicate?, John Eldard
• Re: screen voltage, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • screen voltage, mpriestley
  • Re: screen voltage, Len Olszewski
• Markety Markety, Kelly Hoffman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Markety Markety, Arthur Comings
  • Re: Markety Markety, Stephen Bernhardt
  • Re: Markety Markety, Ad absurdum per aspera
• More on What to say to people who LIKE passive voice, Doug Montalbano
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: More on What to say to people who LIKE passive voice, Doug Montalbano
  • Re: More on What to say to people who LIKE passive voice, Len Olszewski
  • Re: More on What to say to people who LIKE passive voice, Jim Venis
  • Re: More on What to say to people who LIKE passive voice, Michael Gos
• "Seed crystals" : display (vt) and appear (vi), Rebecca
• More on the topic of words . . ., Doug Montalbano
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: More on the topic of words . . ., Jane_Torpie_at_III-HQ
• Five Trademark Essentials, LaVonna Funkhouser
• What to say to people who LIKE the passive voice, David Tietyen
• Picking on me - Indicate, John Eldard
• Re: the passive voice, Stephen Bernhardt
• comma splice?, mpriestley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: comma splice?, Heather Atkinson
  • Re: comma splice?, Arthur Comings
  • Re: comma splice?, Arthur Comings
  • Re: comma splice?, Karen Kay
  • Re: comma splice?, Arthur Comings
  • Re: comma splice?, Karen Kay
  • Re: comma splice?, Kim Ballard
  • Re: comma splice?, Michael Gos
• To anyone who has tried to reply to me, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Re: More on the topic of words . . .proleptic, Fred M Jacobson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: More on the topic of words . . .proleptic, Jim Venis
• Grad School in Tech Writing, Michelle Adams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Grad School in Tech Writing, Jane Patterson
  • Re: Grad School in Tech Writing, Kathleen Nosbisch
  • Re: Grad School in Tech Writing, Paul Trummel
  • Grad School in Tech Writing, Alexander Friedlander
• Judging Books by Subject Matter, Ellen Fenwick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Judging Books by Subject Matter, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Judging Books by Subject Matter, Ann Balaban
• SF Bay Area STC Press Release, Wren Withers
• WANTED: Benchmarking Partners!!!!, stampsj
• Call for abstracts-"Recent and Relevant", Dr. Rita Reaves
• Returned mail: Host unknown, Laura Lemay
• passives, etc., Steve Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • passives, etc., Michael Spooner
  • Re: passives, etc., Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: passives, etc., Sumithra Jagannath
  • Re: passives, etc., Matthew Wong
  • Re: passives, etc., Charles P. Campbell
  • Re: passives, etc., Don M Chaffee
• Testing (was Re: Certification), Steve Owens
• Passive voice, Steve Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Passive voice, John Oriel
  • Re: Passive voice, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re[2]: Passive voice, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Passive voice, FOLTZ_J
  • Re: Passive voice, Paul David Marvel
  • Re: Passive voice, John Oriel
• Spelling Flames, Steve Owens
• Personal -- Truncated messages, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Re: Competition judging, Jacobs Chris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Competition judging, Mike Beyries
  • Re: Competition judging, Ad absurdum per aspera
• Compact Discs, Frank A. Saucier
• Another pet peeve, Less is more.
• passives, Anatole Wilson
• [no subject], Charles Cox
• 1. Passive Voice, Vollbach, Elizabeth
• Re: More on What to say to people who LIKE passive voice (fwd), Len Olszewski
• Re: Ongoing situational scenarios, Alun Whittaker
• Certification, George
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Certification, Steve Fouts
  • Re: Certification, Heather Atkinson
  • Re: Certification, Lee Brasseur
  • Re: Certification, Sue Stewart
• Active vs. Passive, Chad Kaiwi Southern
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Active vs. Passive, Charles P. Campbell
  • Re: Active vs. Passive, Stephen Bernhardt
• STC-SV Chapter Meeting - February, Susan Mitchell
• Usability Testing, Donna Ellis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Usability Testing, Kathy Barreto
  • Re: Usability Testing, Kris Jaeger
• picky grammar stuff, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Verbing words, LaVonna Funkhouser
• English Nerds!!!, Jerold Jeansonne
• Usability, Lori Lathrop
• Whack Any Key, Paul David Marvel
• The liability issues of documentation, James Conklin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The liability issues of documentation, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: The liability issues of documentation, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: The liability issues of documentation, Doug Osborn
• Included text, Steve Owens
• Outlook for writers good..., Nancy Hoft
• The Associated Press Stylebook, Vollbach, Elizabeth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Associated Press Stylebook, Charles P. Campbell
• comma splice: you're absolutely right. I should have thought about it, mpriestley
• Dissertations, Jerold Jeansonne
• [no subject], Jim Dubinsky
• Japan-US difference in document preferences, Noriko Yotsuyanagi
• English Only--Update, Karen Kay
• -No Subject-, Ilana Katz
• Re: Defining Tutorial etc., Shannon Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Defining Tutorial etc., Peg Mauer
  • Re: Defining Tutorial etc., Shannon Ford
  • Re: Defining Tutorial etc., Susan Fowler
• Private for Helena Jerney (sorry, keeps getting returned), Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 5 Feb 1994 to 7 Feb 1994, Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430
• Thanks for the info!, Donna Ellis
• Employee or Contractor? (long post), Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Ms. Thistlebottom returns, Mike Mcgraw
• Re: Using HTML, Janet Ansell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Using HTML, Steve Owens
• Coining Terms, Jerry Blackerby
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Coining Terms, Chuck Banks
• About that comma splice, Sue MacIntosh
• Translation (was passive voice), ejray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Translation (was passive voice), Karen Kay
• Wanted: technical documents written for Chinese readers, Jing Xu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Wanted: technical documents written for Chinese readers, Jing Xu
• Please un-subscribe, Stan Sulkes
• Re: NEXT FUNNE MEETING..., Doug Montalbano
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • NEXT FUNNE MEETING..., Paul Brady 5797
• Re[3]: January Video, Chuck Banks
• Reader survey expert "ad" (fwd), Charles Fisher
• Re: Translation Qualifications, Sue Stewart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Translation Qualifications, Nancy Hoft
• Netiquette, MSTSACX
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Netiquette, Karen Kay
• To Bonni Graham, Mark Levinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: To Bonni Graham, Chuck Banks
• Cost of translation, Mark Levinson
• Translation topic, JACK P. SHAW
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Translation topic, Karen Kay
  • Re: Translation topic, Robert Bononno
• Consulting Seminar, John Eldard
• Doc Dept Mgmt, Kathleen Nosbisch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Doc Dept Mgmt, Mike Mcgraw
  • Re: Doc Dept Mgmt, Steve Pope
• CD-ROM capacity, Charles Fisher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CD-ROM capacity, Paul David Marvel
• OED on CD-ROM?, Guy Haas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OED on CD-ROM?, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: OED on CD-ROM?, Dianne Phelan
• Video Tapes, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• February Video, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Chad Kaiwi Southern
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Christine M. Davis
  • Re: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Tim Pera
  • Re: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Matthew Wong
  • Re: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Mark Hagen
• Reply to: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Tammy Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Reply to: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Jim Venis
  • Re: Reply to: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Melody DeMeritt
  • Re: Reply to: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Melody DeMeritt
  • Re: Reply to: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Richard Irvine
  • Re: Reply to: Ain't nothin' wrong with me gramma', Mike
• Usability Professionals, Donna Ellis
• Wee Professionals, Chuck Banks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wee Professionals, Michael Gos
  • Re: Wee Professionals, Mike
• Gregg vs Chicago, David A Lowe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gregg vs Chicago, Charles P. Campbell
• Why we nitpick, Mark Levinson
• Nitpicking on the list, ejray
• Nitpicking, MSTSACX
• Respect, Tammy Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Respect, Shannon Ford
  • Re: Respect, Mike
  • Re: Respect, Joe Fockler
  • Re: Respect, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Terminology for Windows Applications, Andrea Magers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Terminology for Windows Applications, Chuck Banks
  • Re: Terminology for Windows Applications, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Terminology for Windows Applications, Faith Weber
• OK people, it's time to get a life., Patrick O'Connell
• Purpose of list, Jim Venis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Purpose of list, ejray
  • Re: Purpose of list, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Purpose of list, Sue Stewart
  • Re: Purpose of list, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: Purpose of list, Elwin McKellar
• Articles for "interchange", LYNN PERRY
• Beating translation to death..., JACK P. SHAW
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Beating translation to death..., Robert Bononno
  • Re: Beating translation to death..., Karen Kay
• Respect (or Political Correctness?), Paul Trummel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Respect (or Political Correctness?), Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: Respect (or Political Correctness?), Jim Gifford
  • Re: Respect (or Political Correctness?), Sue Stewart
  • Re: Respect (or Political Correctness?), Elwin McKellar
• E-Prime, Jim Venis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: E-Prime, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: E-Prime, M DeMeritt
  • E-Prime, Jim Venis
  • Re: E-Prime, Donna Ellis
  • Re: E-Prime, Donna Ellis
  • Re: E-Prime, Jim Venis
  • Re: E-Prime, Stan Andermann
  • Re: E-Prime, Nancy Hoft
  • Re: E-Prime, Jim Venis
  • Re: E-Prime, Melody DeMeritt
  • Re: E-Prime, Less is more.
  • E-PRIME, Thomas Barker
  • e-prime, Thomas Barker
  • Re: E-Prime, Don M Chaffee
  • Re: E-Prime, Randy Allen Harris
  • Re: E-Prime, Jim Venis
  • E-prime, Michele Berkes 615-576-2352
• Modern Language Association, Matthew Wong
• To Expand on One of Saul's Points, Vollbach, Elizabeth
• Internet Snooping, Chuck Banks
• Re[2]: Minimalist Writing, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Minimalist Writing, Jim Venis
  • Minimalist Writing, Michael Gos
  • Re: Minimalist Writing, Ellen Fenwick
  • Re: Minimalist Writing, Heli Roosild
  • Re: Minimalist Writing, Stephen Bernhardt
• Re: Reply to: "babe", Jim Venis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Reply to: "babe", Mike
• Indexing information, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indexing information, Binion Amerson
  • Re: Indexing information, Chuck Banks
  • Re: Indexing information, Mike Beyries
  • Re: Indexing information, Ellen Fenwick
  • Indexing Information, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Indexing information, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Chad's gramma', LaVonna Funkhouser
• Re: "babe", Jim Venis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: "babe", Chuck Banks
• Re: Smileys, Jim Venis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re[2]: Smileys, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Smileys, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: Re[2]: Smileys, Mark Hagen
• Re: help needed -- e-mail censorship and company policy, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • help needed -- e-mail censorship and company policy, Sarah T. Harris
  • Re: help needed -- e-mail censorship and company policy, Pochun Chan
  • Re: help needed -- e-mail censorship and company policy, Linda Enders
  • Re: help needed -- e-mail censorship and company policy, Karen Kay
• [no subject], karis william
• Help Authoring Tools, R. Darren Carlton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Help Authoring Tools, Steve Owens
  • Re: Help Authoring Tools, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Help Authoring Tools, Faith Weber
  • Re: Help Authoring Tools, Roger A Tunsley
  • Re: Help Authoring Tools, Gary Dettmers
  • Re: Help Authoring Tools, R. Darren Carlton
  • Re: Help Authoring Tools, Kathleen Nosbisch
• Electronic Mail, MSTSACX
• :-) SMILES, M DeMeritt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: :-) SMILES, Heli Roosild
• Re: Minimalist Writing--literature refs, Shannon Ford
• Those Ubiquitous Smileys, Kim Ballard
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 8 Feb 1994 to 9 Feb 1994, Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 8 Feb 1994 to 9 Feb 1994, Billie Wahlstrom
  • Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 8 Feb 1994 to 9 Feb 1994, David Farkas
• E-mail privacy, John Eldard
• [no subject], Ellen Fenwick
• Minimalist Design, David Tietyen
• Manuals types, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• ISO 9000 video, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• My Employment Situtation, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• e-mail censorship and company policy, Simon North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: e-mail censorship and company policy, Paul Trummel
• Indexing tangent, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Indexing tangent, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Indexing Tangent, Lori Lathrop
• Silicon Valley Bookstores, Karen Kay
• Yea, me too, Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
• This is NOT Nitpicking!, Vollbach, Elizabeth
• re- e-prime and truth, Tracey Showalter
• Re: minimalist writing (an example), Robin M. Foster
• Recommendations for training development books?, Sue MacIntosh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Recommendations for training development books?, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Recommendations for training development books?, Susan Fowler
• luminous vs. light as adjectives, Robert Bononno
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Paul David Marvel
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Stan Andermann
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Paul David Marvel
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Robert Bononno
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Robert Bononno
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Robert Bononno
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Paul David Marvel
  • Re: luminous vs. light as adjectives, Robert Bononno
• Overseas Technical Writing, Christine M. Davis
• The focus of indexes, Rowena Campbell
• In-house indexer needed, Lori Lathrop
• It's OK Dave, and speaking of pubs..., Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430
• pubs and the STC annual conference, Usability Expertise Center ph.603.881.2430
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: pubs and the STC annual conference, Chuck Banks
  • Re: pubs and the STC annual conference, LaVonna Funkhouser
• truck-flattened smiley, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: truck-flattened smiley, Mark Hagen
  • Re: truck-flattened smiley, Kelly Axup
  • Re: truck-flattened smiley, Sue Stewart
• [no subject], Tim Pera
• Re: E-Prime (Passive Voice), Paul Trummel
• Call For Papers, Jerold Jeansonne
• Re: Dirty Laundry, Joe Fockler
• Hunting for summer internship, Robert Owens
• Re: E-Prime and Klingon, Randy Allen Harris
• Re: Non-verbal Cues Online (was Flat Smiley), Doug Montalbano
• Klingon E-prime?, Craig Haggart, Accelerator Ops
• Hello again, Chad Kaiwi Southern
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hello again, A. LiLia Santana
  • Re: Hello again, Len Olszewski
• Word Choice, Michael Christie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Word Choice, Steve Owens
  • word choice, Rowena Campbell
  • Re: Word Choice, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Word Choice, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Word Choice, John Eldard
  • Re: Word Choice, Fred M Jacobson
  • Re: Word Choice, Karen Steele
• TECHWR-L Digest - 10 Feb 1994, Gordon Meyer
• Re: RTF "standard", Gordon Meyer
• light as adjective (not), Randy Allen Harris
• Re: RTF "standard" - Word 6, Fred Wersan
• Mouse: Mouses or mice?, Jim Grey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mouse: Mouses or mice?, Steve Fouts
• Re: LIST options change, Jacobs Chris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • LIST options change, Kim Ballard
  • Re: LIST options change, Kris Jaeger
  • Re: LIST options change, Karen Kay
  • Re: LIST options change, Karen Kay
  • Re: LIST options change, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: LIST options change, Pat Anderson
  • Re: LIST options change, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: LIST options change, Guy Haas
  • Re: LIST options change, Sue Stewart
  • Re: LIST options change, Steve Owens
  • Re: LIST options change, Sue Stewart
  • Re: LIST options change, Sue Stewart
  • Re: LIST options change, Dean Elzinga
  • Re: LIST options change, Dominique de Vet
  • Re[2]: LIST options change, Chuck Banks
  • Re: Re[2]: LIST options change, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: LIST options change, Paul Trummel
  • Re: LIST options change, Arthur Comings
  • LIST Options Change, Steve Owens
  • LIST Options Change, MSTSACX
• LIST Options Changed! Please Read., ejray
• Re: Mouse- Mouses or mice?, Tracey Showalter
• Re: Non-verbal Cues Online, Elliott C. Evans
• Help! Excess Fonts in FrameMaker4, Peter Khu
• tan:Verbing words (medal), LaVonna Funkhouser
• Re: List changes, Faith Weber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • List changes, Sue Stewart
  • list changes, Fred M Jacobson
• Defining roles: tech editors and writers, Jim Venis
• Now *here's* a job title..., Anatole Wilson
• Help: is there really a Jerry Zar?, Ken d'Albenas
• Tracking Hypertext Links, R. Darren Carlton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tracking Hypertext Links, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Re: Tracking Hypertext Links, Linda H. Schoenhoff
  • Re: Tracking Hypertext Links, Elwin McKellar
• Lit-picking, Mark Levinson
• Recommendation for HTML editor, HTML Assistant, ejray
• Re: light as adjective (not), Robert Bononno
• LSP 1995 in Vienna, Outi Jarvi
• light as adjective (boring; grammar hounds only), Randy Allen Harris
• Survey on use of WANs, Marj Rush Hovde
• Eureka!, Chuck Banks
• S/N Ratio is now better, Gregory=Kushmerek%AcctgMed%FIN
• E-Prime passives, John Oriel
• What TECHWR-L Means to Me (was Hello Again), Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What TECHWR-L Means to Me (was Hello Again), John Eldard
• job opening in East Tennessee, Michele Berkes 615-576-2352
• More on LIST options change, Kelly Hoffman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: More on LIST options change, Vicki Rosenzweig
  • Re: More on LIST options change, Doug Montalbano
• CADD, Tracey Showalter
• Seminar recommendations wanted, Lisa Ann Jurgens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Seminar recommendations wanted, Pam Tatge
• Change to Reply Function, Vollbach, Elizabeth
• Author's Permission, Vollbach, Elizabeth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Author's Permission, Mike Mcgraw
• Virus Humor (LONG APPEND), Lori Lathrop
• Why this list?, Mike Hamity
• Copyrights and STC Newsletters, MSTSACX
• Metro Baltimore STC meeting, BURGAMW1
• List change? No problem!, Craig Haggart, Accelerator Ops
• Benefits of this list...making new friends in Wash DC, Peg Mauer
• [no subject], karis william
• Jargon; to medal; intro. David B.; rhetoric of science, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Honours and masters theses abstracts wanted, Randy Allen Harris
• To medal or not to medal, Arthur Comings
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: To medal or not to medal, Matthew S Novak
• Call for proposals..., Billie Wahlstrom
• Recommendations for training development books - the list!, Sue MacIntosh
• Re: Technical Writing and Editing Standards, Ad absurdum per aspera
• Freelance Indexing Info, Lori Lathrop
• rhetoric of science group, Randy Allen Harris
• ladies and gentlemen, pi now equals 3, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Last Call, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
• Tell Me About Verbing Nouns, Please, Vollbach, Elizabeth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tell Me About Verbing Nouns, Please, Ken d'Albenas
  • Re: Tell Me About Verbing Nouns, Please, Rowena Campbell
• Oops!, Vollbach, Elizabeth
• ASI 26th Annual Meeting, Lori Lathrop
• Re: Magical "Appears", Susan_Gallagher_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Magical "Appears", Kathleen Nosbisch
  • Re: Magical "Appears", Faith Weber
  • Re: Magical "Appears", Len Olszewski
• Using trademarks, etc. within Windows Help, Faith Weber
• pi=3, amy welden
• Reply to: ladies and gentlemen, pi now equals 3, Tammy Williams
• [no subject], Cont-Y
• Help finding a book on copyright, etc., David A Lowe
• Process of Creating Windows Help Files (Long), R. Darren Carlton
• R. Lederer had another think coming, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Personal for Bonni Graham, Tammy Williams
• Re: Minimalism, Karl L. Smart
• Creating Win Help Files, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Windows Help: Resources (LONG POST), Faith Weber
• Frame/Imported Graphics, Joe Fockler
• still need a writer in Northern VA, marcia whitmore
• Business Writing List moves, Traci Gardner
• PhD Programs, Deb Carnegie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PhD Programs, Paul Trummel
  • Re: PhD Programs, R. Darren Carlton
• Technical Writing Assoication, David W. Pfister
• Ph.D. Programs in Technical Communication, MSTSACX
• The Three Components of Performance, MSTSACX
• Announcement for TERM-LIST, Outi Jarvi
• Using "where" to mean "in which", LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Using "where" to mean "in which", Len Olszewski
  • Re: Using "where" to mean "in which", LaVonna Funkhouser
• Whoever it was looking for copyright info..., Jack Shaw
• Using "where' to mean "in which", Anatole Wilson
• Using "where" or "in which", Anatole Wilson
• Monday morning musings about what employers think about technical writers, Sue MacIntosh
• Ph.D. Programs, YOUNG
• Other lists, Steve Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Other lists, John Eldard
  • Re: Other lists, Lori Lathrop
  • Re: Other lists, Vicki Rosenzweig
• Now here's an idea..., Steve Owens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Now here's an idea..., ejray
  • Re: Now here's an idea..., Len Olszewski
  • Re: Now here's an idea..., Chuck Banks
  • Re: Now here's an idea..., Anatole Wilson
  • Re: Now here's an idea..., Susan Fowler
  • Re: Now here's an idea..., Anatole Wilson
• "mail-server -at- nisc -dot- sri -dot- com" correct address?, Steve Owens
• Re[2]: What employers think about technical writers, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What employers think about technical writers, Jim Grey
  • Re: What employers think about technical writers, Jim Grey
• Contract vs. Full time, Steve Fouts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Contract vs. Full time, Maria Townsley
  • Contract vs. Full time, Karen Steele
• alternatives to smilies, mpriestley
• Re: Now here's an idea, Lissa Story
• Using "where" to mean "in which"--not preferred usage, Rebecca
• Computer Manuals That Are Good Enough, JAMES MCCORMICK - MT. ROYAL COLLEGE
• Windows Help authoring tools, Faith Weber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Windows Help authoring tools, Matthew Wong
• Re: Computer Manuals...., Brad Mehlenbacher
• How do I unsubscribe?, Helena Jerney
• Re: What employers think, Doug Osborn
• Re: ICON '94 - Anybody going?, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ICON '94 - Anybody going?, Jim Grey
• Professionalism--was Contract vs. Full time, ejray
• Management Situation, Jim Grey
• Embedded Indexing Survey Results (LONG, 242 lines), Nancy C. Mulvany
• Money Magazine Survey, John Eldard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Money Magazine Survey, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Money Magazine Survey, Lisa Ann Jurgens
• If our companies sold technical writing, it'd be a different, Vollbach, Elizabeth
• PARTITIONED Data Sets, Joyce Hammock
• Documentation mgmt software needed, Thomas Barker
• Stress, Vollbach, Elizabeth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Stress, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • Re: Stress, Kelly Hoffman
  • Re: Stress, John Eldard
• International Dimensions of Technical Communication, Paul David Marvel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: International Dimensions of Technical Communication, Robert Bononno
• teaching assistantship, mike markel
• Re: What can we do? (was: Contract vs. Full time), Ken d'Albenas
• Benchmarking, John Stamps
• Re: Unicode/ISO 10646, Laura Lemay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Unicode/ISO 10646, Steve Fouts
• suscribe, hdspeck
• thing/think: The final chapter (poll results)*Long*, LaVonna Funkhouser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: thing/think: The final chapter (poll results)*Long*, Sue Stewart
• Good/Bad Examples of Online Help Systems: Query...., Brad Mehlenbacher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Good/Bad Examples of Online Help Systems: Query...., Paul Trummel
• Lowballing, Mark Levinson
• Re: Want ads, Laura Lemay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Want Ads, Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD
  • Want Ads, Steve Fouts
  • want ads, Maria Townsley
  • Re: Want Ads, Len Olszewski
  • Re: Want Ads, Andreas Ramos
• Re2: Grad School in Tech. Writing, Chad Hill
• my typo in Tuft's letter, LaVonna Funkhouser
• Neat Message about TECHWR-L, ejray
• VERBING NOUNS, Thomas Barker
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 26 Feb 1994 to 27 Feb 1994, David Farkas
• Using SGML as HTML and publishable source, Noreen Casey
• Difficult Assignment, Paul Cass
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown
• [no subject], Unknown

---

Thread Index (Switch to Author Index)

---

---

---