TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Defining Terms (Was Re: Judging manuals (by themselves)) From:Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD -at- PROTEON -dot- COM Date:Fri, 4 Feb 1994 10:53:00 EST
Steve notes:
"I think you missed the point of my "tangent" comment. I'm not talking
about STC competitions at all, I'm asking what are the commonly accepted
definitions of reference/user guide/tutorial/quick-reference/workbook/
etc."
Actually, I didn't, because in my first pararaph, I wasn't talking
about competitions either. You asked what I use as commonly accepted
definitions. The STC comp. guidelines are the closest I've seen to a
standard definition. They're the definition I commonly accept.
They're commonly accepted by most of the people I deal with.
Therefore, from my point of view, I answered your question, then went
off on my own tanget. I just forgot to turn on the "new subject"
light. :)
It is a valid question. We as a profession have got to come up with
some kind of standard (open to reasonable variation, of course),
because we're confusing the h*** out of our users.
I think most people view tutorial as a step-by-step, hand-holding walk
through the product, and look to a User's Guide for more theoretical,
when-to-use issues. At least that's been my experience. Yet often,
that's not how they're labeled, if they're even labeled at all.
I don't know the answer offhand to how to solve this -- time for more
brainstorming?
Bonni Graham |
Technical Writer | Most software is run by
Easel Corporation, ENFIN Technology Lab | confused users acting on
Bonni_Graham_at_Enfin-SD -at- relay -dot- proteon -dot- com | incorrect and incomplete
President, San Diego STC | information, doing things
| the designer never expected.
NOTE: apparently my email address needs |
to be typed exactly as it appears here, | --Paul Heckel, quoted
punctuation and all, or the system gets | by William Horton
upset. |