TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: While we're on the topic of words . . . From:Gary Dettmers <garyd -at- TEKELEC -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 4 Feb 1994 16:36:31 -0600
Picky Peg wrote:
> I must be a purist, because I still have a problem with, "prioritize" -
> is it just me?
It could be all of us Peg. It seems everyone has their own pet peeve(s) about
using the English language. We can't change the world, but we can change
ourselves. If someone points out to me that I've garbled a sentence, or that
I've slaughtered a noun as malapropos, then all I can do is chalk it all up
to imperfection. Hopefully, I'll learn something from it and do better the
next time.
BTW, I checked two dictionaries. The word, "prioritize", is listed in both of
them. Webster's II does state the following on usage:
"Many condemn the use of _prioritize_ on the grounds that it is jargon, but
in recent times it has become firmly established in English at all levels of
speech and writing."
____________________________________________________________________
Gary Dettmers | |
Sr. Technical Writer | My opinions are just that, mine! |
Tekelec | Do not confuse them as Tekelec |
garyd -at- mailhost -dot- oh -dot- tekelec -dot- com | policy. |
____________________________________________________________________|