TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:"U-prime" From:Ken d'Albenas <kendal -at- AUTOTROL -dot- CUC -dot- AB -dot- CA> Date:Fri, 6 May 1994 11:34:11 MDT
I'll rise to the bait: no passives, no "be"s, no polysyllabic
words . . .
Thanks to the past week's mail, I've learned some new ways to
stretch the brain cells:
(a) try to write in E-prime;
(b) try not to end with a preposition*; and/or
(c) write naught but short* words.
Hey, I think I like it! This thread can help me in my work,
yet it lets me have fun at the same time.
* (Arrghh, I give up! I can't think of one-syllable words for
"preposition" and "one-syllable!" %-}
I have one more to throw in the pot. In the same vein as
"E-prime," I'll call it U-prime ("U" for "use").
I once read a book that said we should not use the word "use."
Not as a noun, not as a verb; no where, no how. At least, we
should try hard to steer clear of it.
"Why!?" I hear you ask in a shocked tone. Well, the book said
that we all tend to use [sic] the word "use" a lot - 'way-y-y
too much; in fact, we tend to beat the poor word to death.
The book called that a cop-out, if not a sin, and urged us to
think hard [and click our heels twice? - ed.] and try to say
what we have to say with no trace of the "u" word. Once we've
trained the brain in this vein, we can then slack off a bit
and write the "u" word now and then, though not too much. It
packs a whole lot more punch that way.
(Phew!)
Ken d'Albenas
(-::
==================================================
The goal of science is to build better mousetraps.
The goal of nature is to build better mice.
- Anon.
==================================================