TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Background From:Carma C Allen <ccallen -at- CCGATE -dot- DP -dot- BECKMAN -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 2 Nov 1994 11:53:58 -0800
--Boundary (ID 3seDuVz4Sl9cImnFKWlLMQ)
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Paul's answer was excellent! Over the years (more than I like to thin=
k about) I=20
have written on such subjects as survival in the desert, how to const=
ruct a=20
portable air base (in 6 hours), fighter plane flight manuals, operati=
on of=20
electronic direction-finding systems, and=C4currently=C4operation and=
care of=20
medical laboratory test equipment. I didn't start out as an expert on=
any of=20
these subjects, but I learned very quickly. Interviewing SMEs is IMHO=
the most=20
vital skill you can have as a technical writer.
Carma
ccallen -at- ccgate -dot- dp -dot- beckman -dot- com
_______________******____________________****______________________
=46rom: Paul Strandlund <Paul -dot- Strandlund -at- X400UX -dot- SASKTEL -dot- SK -dot- CA=
Subject: Background
Comments: To: TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L <TECHWR-L -at- OSUVM1 -dot- B=
ITNET>
Reply to: Background
> Here's a general question for technical writers and educators:
> What do you find is the best combination between technical knowledg=
e and
>composition experience? In other words, should an aspiring technica=
>writer/educator strive to be more versed on computer science fundame=
ntals or
> advanced grammar? Where do you believe that one's priorities shoul=
d be
> placed? Make any distinctions (ie education vs. workplace) that yo=
> need to make as I understand that different circumstances dictate
> different responses.
I am actually going to post this one to the list because I have virtu=
ally no
background in computer science but I am a technical writer. I have n=
background in advanced grammer for that matter. My background includ=
es a
Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Economics and years of experi=
ence as a
waiter. IMHO, this does not make me a poor writer.
Maybe its just me, but the requirements that I see one needing are th=
e ability
to read, the ability to ask questions, and the ability to think ratio=
nally. If
all the abilities exist in the person who wants the position then the=
y will be
able to learn all aspects necessary to perform the duties required.
The reason for my thinking stems from the fact that I write about num=
erous
different topics in my position. Working at a telecommunications com=
pany as a
technical writer menas writing about everything that you can possiby =
think of
(almost). We are responsible for all corporate policies, procedures,=
and
practices that must be followed. This vast array of topics does not =
allow for
one to have a great technical background.
Your question would be better asked to see if there is an optimum mix=
of writing
skills and desire to learn. This would allow for a wider response fi=
eld than
only asking about computer knowledge.
These are just my thoughts, a minority of one so to speak, and I felt=
that they
needed to be voiced this time. Please remember that there are more t=
han just
technical writers for computer companies on this list.
Thanks for your time,
> James Inman
Paul
paul -dot- strandlund -at- sasktel -dot- sk -dot- ca