TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: What to call us From:"Cepek, Marta" <marta -at- M3ISYSTEMS -dot- QC -dot- CA> Date:Mon, 12 Jun 1995 23:26:35 -0400
Re: whether we should be called technical writers, technical communicators,
document engineers, information engineers, etc.
I'm a technical writer. On special occasions, like on my tax forms, I even
spell it with a capital T and a capital W. My professional responsibilities
require that I do lots of things other than just write, but my primary
responsibilities involve writing, rewriting, and more writing. I don't see
any advertisements in the Careers section of the newspaper for Technical
Communicators or Information Engineers; I see plenty for Technical Writers.
While I don't have any objection to my peers/colleagues adopting other
titles for the same work I do, I don't know who it *really* impresses. I
know that when I meet a Sanitation Engineer, I'm dealing with a garbage man
with a vocabulary (or a thesaurus).
Perhaps it's because we change the subject when we're asked what we do...
We say what we *are* (technical writers, technical communicators, document
engineers, information engineers, etc.), when asked what we do, when we
should be telling people what we *do* (I can't speak for the rest of the
list, but I write software documentation).