Re: What to call us

Subject: Re: What to call us
From: Steve Wax <stevewx -at- ESKIMO -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 01:03:41 -0700

Marta wrote:
<snip>

>While I don't have any objection to my peers/colleagues adopting other
>titles for the same work I do, I don't know who it *really* impresses. I
>know that when I meet a Sanitation Engineer, I'm dealing with a garbage man
>with a vocabulary (or a thesaurus).

<snippity snip>

>We say what we *are* (technical writers, technical communicators, document
>engineers, information engineers, etc.), when asked what we do, when we
>should be telling people what we *do*.

Thanks for your insightful and sensible post. Of course we should be doing
as you suggest because, existentialist echoes aside, we are what we do.
steve wax stevewx -at- eskimo -dot- com
-------------------------------------------------------------
After the final no there comes a yes
and on that yes the future world depends. --Wallace Stevens


Previous by Author: Re: Sentence structure
Next by Author: Re: Humor, Dr. Suess
Previous by Thread: Re: What to call us
Next by Thread: Re: What to call us


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads