TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: What to call the beige box... From:Ed Rush <EdRush -at- AOL -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 21 Jun 1995 06:15:43 -0400
>But as tech writers, ought we not to be conscious of
>speaking with soem accuracy?
> ***
>Herman Holtz
Uh, yes.
"System unit" is what IBM uses for The Box. Apple tends to have things
plugged into "the Macintosh," and thereby avoids having to use such a general
term. "System," of course, is that remarkable vague word that can mean just
about anything from a LAN full of servers to a subroutine. "CPU" is
meaningless to Joe Whatsacomputer, aside from being yet another TLA.
Much as it galls me to agree with IBM, it does seem to be a good term for the
thing.