Re. Indexing

Subject: Re. Indexing
From: Geoff Hart <geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 13:08:37 LCL

A few folks asked for "true confessions" about how we index. I confess
to being a traditionalist... I do it entirely by hand. (Yes, this
_will_ be a problem for my 1000-page magnum opus.)

I use the philosophy that the ultimate index contains at least one
entry per paragraph: since each paragraph contains a single thought
(or a few closely tied thoughts), it makes sense to provide an index
entry to point readers towards that thought. (Think of this as a
context-sensitive index.) This approach would be completely
unmanagable under really tight deadline pressure; in such cases, I
resort to examining each section (heading, subheading, and
sub-subheading) and coming up with three or four keywords that
describe the section.

Finally, I do duplicate entries. As a user, I really hate entries that
say "ROTFL: see rolling on the floor laughing", particularly when
there's a single page number after the cross-referenced text. Note:
this poses the problem of what to do when ROTFL doesn't appear in the
text but the spelled-out phrase does. Here, I like to use "rolling....
("ROTFL" in text): page 123".

Could I get someone to pay me for the countless hours this would take
to do right? Generally no. But it's the only way I'm aware of to
produce a really useful index that is adequately context-sensitive.
New tools are coming out that use fuzzy logic technology to add
context, and these appear promising.


--Geoff Hart #8^{)}
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca

Disclaimer: If I didn't commit it in print in one of
our reports, it don't represent FERIC's opinion.


Previous by Author: Re. nontraditional papers
Next by Author: Re. peer review
Previous by Thread: Indexers and Indexing
Next by Thread: Motivating/awarding co-workers for edits...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads