years vs years'

[Bruce Brill <Bruceb -at- ACCENTSOFT -dot- COM>]

<<On: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 15:22:42 -0500
Joanne from:    cjs10 -at- CORNELL -dot- EDU wrote
Re: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years':

Melissa & Kevin

You're bringing up an old form which still holds: Two years'
experience; a week's time, an hour's wait, three days' work...

The Chicago Manual of style (among
others) will explain that this is not your garden-variety possessive;
it's based on the genitive case (yeah, English used to have one) which
is the case that governs belonging, or possession.

Joanna>>

Hi Joanna & all,

My initial feeling on this question was to agree with Joanna and The
Chicago Manual of Style and opt for using the apostrophe;  but,
precisely thanks to both Joanna's reference to The Chicago Manual of
Style, I have changed my mind.  Note:  One could reword the title of
_The Chicago Manual of Style_ to "_The Chicago Style Manual_", but
never "_The Chicago Style's Manual_."  Therefore, thanks to "_The
Chicago Manual of Style_," [quotes here indicate a title, not
ridicule] I dare to disagree with _The Chicago Manual of Style_.

Bruce Brill



_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
 FREE JONATHAN POLLARD
Odd Request? Check Website:
http://www.interlog.com/~abrooke/jp/brill/brill.htm
Bruce Brill <bruceb -at- accentsoft -dot- com>

 TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot-  Send commands
   to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
  Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/  or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html