Re: Re[2]: Certification Redux

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Certification Redux
From: Becca Price <rp51 -at- CHRYSLER -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:51:09 -0400

Arlen wrote:
>>So while it's all well and good to *say* that a certificate will be
optional, the reality is that it will either be a completely meaningless
waste of time and money or it will be a job requirement. There's not a
whole lot of middle ground between those positions.<<

I'm not so sure that's true. A P.E. is an optional certificate;
certainly
I know many excellent engineers who don't have one, but it is by no
means
a job requirement.

This is not to say I'm in favor of certification, just a point.

-becca

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Electrons First, Paper Second
Next by Author: Re: Certification issue
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: Certification Redux
Next by Thread: Re: Certification Redux


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads