Re: Collective nouns revisited

Subject: Re: Collective nouns revisited
From: "Wilcox, John (Contractor)" <wilcoxj -at- WDNI -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 09:13:00 -0700

----------
From: A. J. Fite
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU

My question: is a company name a collective noun? In other words, would
it
be appropriate for speakers of British English to say "IBM are" or
"Microsoft were?"
---------------------
Whenever you refer to a group AS A WHOLE you need to use a singular form
of a verb. Thus, for your first example,

IBM is the maker of an operating system better than Windows.
Microsoft isn't.

As for your second example, were can be singular (future conditional).
Thus,

If Microsoft were really concerned with quality, it would redo Word
from the ground up and get rid of all the bugs.


Regards,

John Wilcox, Documentation Specialist
Timberlands Information Services
Weyerhaeuser, WWC 2E2
Tacoma, WA 98477-0001 USA
253-924-7972 wilcoxj -at- wdni -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: alternative to ATM?
Next by Author: Re: The Right Word
Previous by Thread: Re: Collective nouns revisited
Next by Thread: FW: Collective nouns revisited


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads