Re: pet peeve words

Subject: Re: pet peeve words
From: Horace Smith <hsmith -at- WT -dot- NET>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 11:25:27 -0500

At 05:01 PM 9/12/97 PDT, Christopher Knight wrote:
>Way worse than "paradigm", and all over the place these days: "closure".
>Makes my ears grind.
>
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
>to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
>browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
>
How about "utilize," "past history", "future planning," "single most
important,", etc.
Actually I suppose a paradigm(s) is really a quad of nickels?

Horace Smith

>
Horace Smith
Sr. Documentation Engineer
Syntron, Inc.
mailto:hsmith -at- wt -dot- net
mailto:smith -at- syntron -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Emphasis and Conventions
Next by Author: Florida Agencies
Previous by Thread: Re: pet peeve words
Next by Thread: Re: pet peeve words


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads