Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology

Subject: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
From: "Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 15:52:49 -0500

See what happens when the archive system goes down?

Mike Huber
mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thiessen, Christopher(Chris) E [SMTP:cthiess -at- CERIDIAN-HR -dot- COM]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 1997 2:47 PM
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
>
>Would "dominant" and "submissive" be better?
>
>Chris Thiessen
>cthiess -at- ceridian-hr -dot- com
> ----------
>From: Darla Kennington
>Date: Wednesday, September 17, 1997 3:54PM
>
>Since we're on the topic of inappropriate terms, I think that the
>analogy of Master and Slave is something we should all be striving to
>eliminate from our vernacular...
>

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Using ragged right in technical publications
Next by Author: Re: Master/Slave
Previous by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology
Next by Thread: Re: Speaking of Improper Terminology


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads