TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Procedure vs. Task vs. Flow From:"Papa, Amy" <PapaA -at- COMCELL -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 14 Nov 1997 10:46:38 -0500
Greetings.
I have been working to set up a policies and procedures writing format
for my department. I already have people writing procedures and
documenting workflow using templates and standard format.
I just received a reference book that I ordered on writing P & P (wanted
the reference primarily for writing policy, not procedure). Lo and
behold, the book says something different than what I have already
implemented for writing procedures. The book says that *Procedures*
always involve 2 or more people, and that *Tasks* are the set of
instructions that one person follows to complete a procedure step.
I have set up a system where procedures for more than one functional
group are *Workflow* documents written in playscript format. I have
called individual sets of instructions *Procedures*, not tasks if they
are for people within the same functional group (e.g. "Help Desk
personnel procedure for doing such-and-such").
Does anyone have some thoughts on whether using "Workflow" and
"Procedures" is still fundamentally correct?
Amy Papa
Comcast Cellular Communications, Inc.
Technical Writer; MIS Department
papaa -at- comcell -dot- com
610.995.5405
Amy Papa
Technical Writer
MIS Department
610.995.5405