[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Corp. vs Corporation in (c)

Subject: Re: Corp. vs Corporation in (c)
From: Joe Miller <joemiller -at- CANBERRA -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:11:51 -0500

>My boss, however has asked me to expand "Corp." into "Corporation". Is there
>any good reason why I should, be it legal or otherwise?

The best reason in the world: that's how the boss wants the company
to be called. A name is spelled (and pronounced) as the name's owner
specifies.

--Joe
joemiller
@canberra.com


If it's about technical communication--post it! If not, don't!
Posts: mailto:techwr-l -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu
Commands: mailto:listserv -at- listserv -dot- okstate -dot- edu (e.g. SIGNOFF TECHWR-L)
Archives: http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html,
http://www.documentation.com/, or http://www.dejanews.com/
Subjects: JOB:, QUESTION:, SUMMARY:, ANNOUNCE:, or none of these.

Previous by Author: Re: cross reference between documents
Next by Author: Re: Idiot Audience
Previous by Thread: Corp. vs Corporation in (c)
Next by Thread: Re: Corp. vs Corporation in (c)

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads