TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Question about Programmers and Usability From:"Susan L. Schneider" <sschneider -at- CRAFTMIER -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 26 Feb 1998 10:48:13 -0800
"Close to the Machine" was written by Ellen Ullman. I just read it (it's a
quick read), and I highly recommend it.
-----Original Message-----
>I recently read a wonderful little philosophical book written by a
>software engineer called "Close to the machine" by I can't remember who
>right now (but it came out pretty recently). In the first chapter the
>author talks about the mind shift programmers must undergo to translate
>user needs and expectations into coded programs. She describes going
>from a meeting with future users of an AIDS medical care database to
>discussions with her programming team, and how the focus changes so
>radically from the big picture to what she calls the "code zone". I
>won't repeat it all here, go get the book and read it.
>
>But in light of Suzanne's question, it makes me wonder. Aside from the
>fact that we do love to condense all programmers to some moronic social
>state, given the fact that they're all so insufferably arrogant that we
>have to harp on something we're better at (grin). But I wonder if their
>seeming obtuseness is simply because we tend to talk to them late in the
>process. By the time we're trying to document the app, they're long
>past the design phase and are deep in the code zone. They're long past
>thinking about *why* they're doing something--the focus is now all on
>*how*. And maybe they've been given little reason to make the journey
>back to *why*.
>
>On the other hand, maybe they just respect us so darn much they expect
>us to know what the hell they're talking about.
>
>Anyone else read "Close to the Machine"?
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Sella Rush
>mailto:sellar -at- apptechsys -dot- com
>Applied Technical Systems, Inc. (ATS)
>Bremerton, Washington USA
>Developers of the CCM Database
>