TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Interview Questions (deliberately veering from techie vs non- techie...)
Subject:Re: Interview Questions (deliberately veering from techie vs non- techie...) From:"Wing, Michael J" <mjwing -at- INGR -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 11 May 1998 15:51:50 -0500
At one interview, I was asked if I was a perfectionist. I said, "No". The
interviewer then asked, "why not?". I replied that "A perfectionist in
technical writing is almost as bad as someone who slops over the work. They
waste too much time on the fluff. You reach a point where the results from
further effort do not justify the time being spent. It's at that time that
you should let go of the document and let the Editors and reviewers do their
job." The interviewer said, "Good answer. We're on some tight timelines."
Another interesting question came during my breakfast interview with the
Personnel Director.
Director: "Hold on there boy. Why don't I see any grits or biscuits and
gravy on your plate?"
Me: "I'd prefer English muffins, eggs, and bacon. By the way, what are
grits?"
Director: "Oh-oh, looks like someone didn't read the Southern acclimation
guide from the packet we mailed."