TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Important News for Writers (long) From:Linda Castellani <linda -at- GRIC -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 7 Jul 1998 14:20:51 -0500
Have you ever tried to get this insurance? If so, what company provided it?
At 02:11 PM 7/7/98 -0700, Tammy Dysert wrote:
>Hate to say it, but the best way to protect yourself against this rule is
>to get insurance. Most companies won't even work with independents unless
>they are insured for errors and omissions...
>---------------------- Forwarded by Tammy Dysert on 07/07/98 02:04 PM
>---------------------------
>
>
>Barbara Karst-Sabin <Phillinion -at- AOL -dot- COM>
>07/07/98 02:02 PM
>
>
>Please respond to Phillinion -at- AOL -dot- COM
>
>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>cc: (bcc: Tammy Dysert)
>Subject: Re: Important News for Writers (long)
>
>
>
>
>In a message dated 98-07-07 16:34:25 EDT, mhunterk -at- BNA -dot- COM writes:
><< For technical writers in particular, this
> Article 2B would make *us* responsible for the accuracy and content of our
> work--not our clients. In short, a client could give us lousy copy and no
> help and expect us to create a masterpiece. If we don't, they could take
> action, like withhold payment. >>
>I heard something to this effect among a group of tech writers a couple of
>months ago. The worry then was that, in addition to withholding payment, a
>company might choose to sue the "offending" writer for the cost of
>reprinting.
>Then there's always the possibility of an error in an equipment manual
>which
>would lead to physical injury or damaged property...how's that for giving
>you
>paranoid nightmares?
>This just means to me that I will not only document every time I cannot get
>the appropriate information from the SME or everytime the reviewers fail to
>answer questions or address issues I have queried, I will hang onto that
>material until hell freezes over. \;+))) I would, however, think that few
>companies would resort to these tactics, simply because there are too many
>steps in the process over which the tech writer has no control.
>One hopes,
>BJ
>
>
>
>
>
*\ *\ *\ *\ *\ *\ *\ *\ *\ *\ *
*/ */ */ */ */ */ */ */ */ */ *
Linda Castellani
Technical Writer
GRIC Communications, Inc.
1421 McCarthy Blvd.
Milpitas, CA 95035
