TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:An apology from George Mena From:"McMARTIN, Robert" <rmcmarti -at- BAEA -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:13:23 +1030
I didn't write this, I'm merely passing it on for George.
An open letter and apology to all on Tech Whirl from George Mena.
> As I sit before my keyboard here at home, I do so to the full
> knowledge
> that rain is falling here in San Francisco at 7:45 am, Saturday,
> October
> 24, 1998. I'm reminded of two things as the rain falls. The first is
> how some of us would say "It's raining cats and dogs outside" to
> describe the weather. The second is the weekly critiques I
> participated
> I was on the staff of San Francisco State University's campus weekly,
> Phoenix, during the late 1970s.
>
> our lead newspaper advisor (and working reporter for the San
> Francisco
> Examiner), typically led the critique. In his critique, he would
> comment on literally every key phrase in every story in the paper to
> remind us just how important it was for us as student reporters to use
> the most accurate language possible in our stories if we were ever to
> become real reporters on daily newspapers one day.
>
> I can still hear him right now, 20 years after his critiques, making
> his
> editorial points. "If it goes without saying in this article, then
> why
> say it at all?" he would say to us as he'd begin his critique. "You
> say
> it's raining cats and dogs outside?," he'd ask us. "If so, where are
> the bodies and why didn't I see them falling when I was standing
> outside
> in the rain waiting for the M line streetcar to show up? And how did
> cats and dogs, who don't have wings last time I looked, get that high
> up
> in the air to begin with, anyway?"
>
> What Lynn and the rest of our instructors were encouraging us to do
> was
> become masters of the written word. If we were to make our living as
> editors, reporters and writers, we had to be as clear and unambiguous
> in the verbage we used in our articles and in our copyediting. We had
> to be clear to the average reader on the street, which decidedly had
> to
> include every student on campus as well as to any member of the
> general
> public who somehow wound up picking up a copy of Phoenix.
>
> What I now realize is that becoming -- and staying -- a master of the
> written word is an ongoing process. It doesn't end after graduation,
> nor does it end when one starts earning a paycheck for what he or she
> is
> hired -- anywhere -- to write.
>
> In my response post to the anonymous poster on his "incident" that
> you've all now read -- and mostly hated -- I used inappropriate terms
> and phrases without realizing it. When I first read the post, I
> heard
> the sound of the poster's pain; his bitterness and bewilderment over
> what had happened to him at a job he was let go from.
>
>
> His words touched a part of my heart and soul that is, sadly, still
> very
> sensitive to even the slightest vibration. This particular part of my
> heart and soul is, to this day, that sensitive because I am a physical
> abuse survivor whether I like it or not. And I let his words strike
> my
> heart and soul with enough emotional force roughly equivalent to a
> 150-megaton nuclear event in the days when nuclear weapons testing was
> still permitted aboveground.
>
> The emotional fallout from the retaliatory strike that was launched
> against me for my poor choice of certain words and phrases has only
> today begun to subside in my heart. Amazingly, it seems to have
> survived the force of the airbursts as the warheads detonated at their
> respective target altitudes for maximum effect. And yet, magically, I
> have re-learned the key lesson that was imparted here.
>
> The lesson is that words can hurt.
>
> It does not matter if the words are spoken or written.
>
> Words can hurt.
>
> And I am supposed to be a master of the written word just like
> everyone
> else here.
>
> And I forgot this lesson.
>
> Words can hurt worse than being hit by a car (which has happened twice
> in my life before I reached my 8th birthday) and worse than having a
> line drive foul ball lined off my face (which happened to me in
> softball
> practice one day many years ago). Used in conjunction with the naked,
> merciless force of my mother's wooden cane as she repeatedly beat my
> back and shoulders with it -- while she was aiming for my head --
> words
> can hurt like hell. At 5-9 and 220 lbs., she was a large woman who
> packed the wallop of a grown man. And she used her brute force
> regularly on me and my brothers and sister whenever the house wasn't
> clean. To this day, I still hate her for that.
>
> Here in the Bay Area, there used to be TV ads that addressed the power
> of words as a way of calling attention to the devastating power of
> words
> on children when used destructively by their parents. Today, I wish
> those ads would be rebroadcast on all television and radio stations on
> Planet Earth and never be allowed to stop being broadcast.
> Words can hurt.
>
> My words hurt the members of this list.
>
> They weren't meant to hurt anyone, but they did.
>
> ity for my poor choice of words. I should have known better and
> thought
> I did when in fact I did not.
>
> I will do my best to do a better job of being a master of the written
> word, especially on this list.
>
> I hope I've helped to start healing a wound that I also caused to all
> of
> you and to myself.
>
> Thank you for reading.
>
> George Mena
> ===========
>
> There it is, guys. How do you feel?
>