TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Document control products From:Mark Forseth <markf -at- MERGE -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:49:06 -0600
>Checked Documentum: way more than we need. $$$$
>Checked PCDocs - seems reasonable. Have heard of FileNet andvisited site
>but gone no further. My net manager is pushing MS VSS.
Most doc-management-software manufacturers charge on the basis of the
number of licenses (users, authors, etc.) at a customer site. Many sell
modular software that allows you to customize per your site's needs. Many
run on multiple Web-server and/or database systems, while others
(Systemcorp) require specific server and Db.
Good systems control permissions (restricted for sensitive management docs,
open for public tech pubs); automatically assign P/Ns and control revs;
control review processes; auto-generate universally viewable (e.g., PDF)
file formats for published docs; etc.
Personally, I'm leaning toward Intranet Solutions, Inc.'s Intra.doc. For
platform-independence, software longevity, and other obvious reasons,
we're looking at Web-based doc-management systems only for this 80+ person
company. Our research reveals the following (Manufacturer, Product; notes
if any -- ??? means not exhaustively researched):
- Documentum (DocPage Builder, RightSite, DocPage Server, DocInput);
Powerful, Web-based, but convoluted and just plain too expensive (>$100K).
- Intranet Solutions, Inc., Intra.doc; Web-based, variable pricing, long
track record. Oracle Db at the heart. Can publish multiple files as one
doc. Viewable Frame, PageMaker, Word, others. Approx. $30K for our
facility.
- OpenText, LiveLink; pricey, platform-specific. Refer to Tier Two Systems,
below.
- Interleaf; proprietary, platform-specific (UNIX and Windows only).
- Lotus, Lotus Notes; ??? likely inadequate
- Xerox (Xsoft?), DocuShare; ???, Web-based
- FrameMaker (Adobe), Curo; Frame quit manufacturing this when Adobe bought
Frame. Refer to Tier Two Systems, below.
- UNIPAC Document Management, CyberDOCS, PC DOCS' Internet/Intranet solution
- Systemcorp, Office Control Web; Web-based for only a year or so. Doesn't
want customers to test Web product "until the next rev is released." Site
too slow to navigate sanely via Mac (not a good omen). Requires specific
database software.
- ALOS Micrographics Corporation, DocWare and DocWare Modules; ???
- Tier Two Systems, Author Assistant for FrameMaker and Curo (Standard
Suite); Enhances Livelink functionality. Curo ODMA accesses Livelink
document- management libraries from ODMA compliant apps; etc.
- Filenet, FileNET EDM solution: Document Manager and Mezzanine; "A
ready-to-use PC workstation document management application designed for
networked Microsoft Windows users."
- Omnex, Aqua; "... for implementing the APQP process (FMEAs, control
plans, PPAP, etc.). Auto flowcharting. Info linking and reuse. Can share
data among docs. Modifiable style sheets."
- TeamWARE, i-Flow 3.0; Can't find the product or the Web site.
- Integral Solutions, Inc., OPACT, APACT, etc.; ???