TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Can vs. May From:Karen Byers <kbyers -at- INFORMIX -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:29:25 -0800
My department's style guide lists:
Can is a verb that indicates the ability to do something.
May is a verb that indicates permission to do something.
Might is a verb that indicates the possibility of doing something.
Karen
Oakland, CA
At 11:38 AM 1/26/99 -0800, Susan W. Gallagher wrote:
>At 09:50 AM 1/26/99 -0800, Thomas Quine wrote:
>>... on ... "can" and "may".
>>
>>... "can"
>>suggests ability; ... "may" suggests permission.
>>
>>The second ... risks sounding condescending, even imperious. I
>>think technical documentation should use the word "may" only rarely.
>
>Well, yeah. Kinda. While "may" suggests permission, it also
>suggests possibility, as in "it may rain". Certainly, this
>would not indicate my giving permission for rain. If you've
>seen my picture in "friendly faces", you know I'd never do
>that! ;-)
>
>In the spirit of possibility rather than permission, I use
>"may" to indicate an arbitrary choice that is not necessarily
>the standard course of events, as in "You may do action A or B,
>but action B provides the additional benefits of...", which,
>in my twisted way of looking at things, says that both actions
>are possible but the later is preferable.
>
>
>
>-Sue Gallagher http://pw1.netcom.com/~gscale/susanwg/
>sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com http://www.expersoft.com
>
>The _Guide_ is definitive.
>Reality is frequently inaccurate. --Douglas Adams
>
>From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000==
>