TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
<< If you do have an "argument" or a point to make about what
you feel is or isn't appropriate, and can state it in a calm, rational
manner, he WILL hear you out, and if you're convincing enough, he may even
amend the posting rules - as has happened occaisionally before - BUT NOT
IF PEOPLE INSIST ON HASHING IT OUT IN PUBLIC.>>
To quote a former president, let me make one thing perfectly clear --
I have no objection to the current rules, and to the administrator's
application of them. If, indeed, a vocal minority insists on trespassing
on the rulese, how els can the "silent majority" make its voice heard, to
let them know that we stand behind the administrator, except to call for
everyone to stand up and be counted.
<<And now, since this type of posting IS off-topic, I shall retire from
this
thread...>>
If you had really believed this to be off-topic, then why not just e-mail
me directly?
