TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Quark Express and FrameMaker From:"Brierley, Sean" <Brierley -at- QUODATA -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:31:32 -0400
The graphics designer should want Quark Express. No surprise there <VBG>.
If you have a high-color marketing piece, newsletter, or small booklet,
consider Quark very carefully.
If you have a greyscale, technical or other document that is long, uses
cross-references and lists (TOC, index, etc.), with many graphics, there is
no choice but FrameMaker.
Good luck.
Sean
sean -at- quodata -dot- com
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: David Thompson [mailto:David -dot- Thompson -at- REALVIZ -dot- COM]
>>>Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 7:34 AM
>>>To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>>>Subject: Quark Express and FrameMaker
>>>
>>>
>>>Hello everyone,
>>>
>>>I am trying to convince my company to go for FrameMaker
>>>while a graphic
>>>designer wants Express.
>>>Has anyone got experience of the two that they would like to share?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>David
>>>
>>
