TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Word to PDF vs. Frame to PDF From:Emru Townsend <etownsen -at- Softimage -dot- com> To:"'techwrl'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:55:33 -0400
Not that I recall. I used PDFMaker for a 400-page SDK, where every API
command was listed as a bookmark. No problems atall.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brierley, Sean [mailto:Brierley -at- Quodata -dot- Com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 3:18 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: RE: Word to PDF vs. Frame to PDF
>
> However, PDFMaker has
> limitations. For example, I believe there is a max number of
> bookmarked
> headers
