TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: insomnia, word styles and an overwhelming number of replies
Subject:RE: insomnia, word styles and an overwhelming number of replies From:"Jane Carnall" <jane -dot- carnall -at- digitalbridges -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:06:32 -0000
Robert Nagle asks:
>It seems absolutely amazing though how many people actively read and
>reply here. When I worked at Dell, I often followed reading lists, but
>gosh, keeping up with this list is practically a full time job in
>itself. How do you guys manage it? I'm a voracious reader and writer,
>but even I find the size and breadth of this list overwhelming for one
>sitting.
When I was on digest, I used to skim-read the whole digest and pause to
focus only on the bits that looked interesting useful. Now I get individual
messages. Every month I delete the ones I haven't read yet that I am
unlikely to find either interesting or useful. (The ones I do read, I
usually delete faster.) One reason why I switched to individual mails from
digest is that there are a very few posters who never seem to have anything
new/useful to contribute - and I can save time by never reading them.
Sometimes, as when I came in this morning, I find I can delete an entire
thread unread immediately. Basically, I find it useful to be able to pick
and choose which bits to read and not read, which posts are keepers and
which are, well, eliminatory material <g>. It's a process! <ggg>
Jane Carnall
Platon: modo fac. Apologies for the long additional sig: it is added
automatically and outwith my control.
E-mail is an informal method of communication and may be subject to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Digital Bridges Ltd will accept no liability. Therefore, it will normally be inappropriate to rely on information contained on e-mail without obtaining written confirmation.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.