TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: STC Letter to the Editor From:SteveFJong -at- aol -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 4 Nov 2002 07:02:19 EST
Andrew, if the definition of a writer is someone who understands the subject
matter, what are you doing typing things in this thread? You demonstrate no
understanding.
Thanks for closing the loop on three of the four points you raised, which you
now retract. You seem to have forgotten one of them, though. You did not say
the competition should be free, and I did not say it was. What you actually
typed was this:
>> 4. Wipe out all the regional competitions and have one national one.
>> Make it a real honor to win.
I wrote back: "To win an international award, an entry must first win an
Award of Distinction from a local competition. If [Andrew] thinks the
competition is already too easy, why advocate making it easier?" I can't tell
from what you typed whether you understand and agree with this.
Anyway, we are left with your point that the competition does not assess
technical accuracy. I did not say that technical accuracy was an unreasonable
standard, I said the opposite: that it is the most important quality factor
for a technical document. What I did say, which you ought to understand
because you retyped it, is that assessing the technical accuracy of a
document as part of the competition requires access to the product it
documents, which STC does not have; and that such an assessment would, if
done right, be too valuable a service to offer merely for the Competitions
entry fee.
Do you have any suggestions how to assess the technical accuracy of a
document without access to the product it documents? Does anyone?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.