TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Preparation for a phone screen interview From:"CB Casper" <knowone -at- surfy -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:33:14 -0800
I fully agree with John on this one.
My portfolio shows what results I am capable
of producing, whether it's graphics, flow
charts, instructions, or fondling fonts.
The tools I use to obtain those results are
just tools. In my last interview, the position
included a requirement for expertise in FM,
which I had never used. Fortunately this did
not preclude me from getting an interview.
My portfolio showed the interviewer what they
needed to know. My 10 years experience using
Interleaf told them that I was capable of
learning, using, and mastering a complex
techwriting tool. As for the interviewer,
he was unconcerned about my experience with
FM, it was about bringing a different
experience to the team that was vital. I was
fortunate in that I talked to someone who "got it".
The question was about results, not tools.
If the question had been about creating
graphs, and you had never used a tool that
creates graphs, then the answer should be No.
This begs a question.
What is the most complex TW tool, and how
long does it take for a complete novice to
be able to produce something reasonable?
How long for someone familiar with the basic
TW tool, MS Word? If you respond, please
change the subject line.
I'm not talking about the products we document,
but the tools we USE to prepare our deliverables.
CB - producing results for over 20 years using
tools that come and go due to various whims
---- Someone other than John ----
But when I talk with technical people, they
usually "get it" and don't care what tools I
have used in the past, because they understand
how quickly an experienced person can do a job
using a new similar tool. To them, FrameMaker
vs. Word, Visio vs. FlowCharter are trivial
discussions rather than dealbreakers.
--
Surfy! http://www.surfy.net Great web search, free web email, and $9.95 unlimited Internet access
Powered by Outblaze
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A new book on Single Sourcing has been released by William Andrew
Publishing: _Single Sourcing: Building Modular Documentation_
is now available at: http://www.williamandrew.com/titles/1491.html.
Help Authoring Seminar 2003, coming soon to a city near you! Attend this
educational and affordable one-day seminar covering existing and emerging
trends in Help authoring technology. See http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.