TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Education (Was Re: Techwriting After the Boom)
Subject:Re: Education (Was Re: Techwriting After the Boom) From:"Mike O." <obie1121 -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 9 Jun 2003 15:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Robert Plamondon asked:
> So I'll ask the group: What single course proved to be
> most useful in your technical writing work?
1. A survey course in W.B. Yeats. Seriously. Yeats started out as a
Victorion poet, with typical affectations and turgid style, but then
became dissatisfied with the lack of precision of that language, and
then forced himself to move to a much more concrete style of writing.
You can see this in his work as the years go by, and watch what he did
to achieve a natural, direct style of writing.
2. Another lit class that required me to write a three-page paper every
week. At first I sweated it, but later I just went to the computer lab
one hour before class and banged it out.
3. Oh, and I took a bunch of typical first-year sciences, chemistry,
biology, physics, etc. And a couple of computer science intros. Which
seems lightweight, but that's how I learned programming concepts that I
use to this day.
But I had a scientific/technical aptitude before college. I built
myself a telescope while in high school, grinding the eight-inch mirror
myself by reading old reference books written during the 'Thirties.
Looking back this was non-trivial... It took a couple of months to
grind, and I had to test the mirror to be parabolic to within
one-quarter of the wavelength of light (using a Foucault knife-edge
test, which is actually not that hard).
I didn't really think of myself as science-oriented; I just wanted a
telescope. I guess I would have bought one if I had the money, but I
didn't. I financed it by cutting grass in the neighborhood. I got old
lawnmowers out of the garbage and got them running by reading an old
Chilton's manual for Briggs and Stratton engines.
And as part of my amateur astronomy hobby, I read tons of
semi-technical magazines and books, and got a basic grounding in
cosmology and astrophysics.
In college I worked in a print shop, running Xerox machines the size of
a Toyota. I often worked all night, so when the machines broke I had to
fix them myself. No manuals, just close observation of the
electrical/electronic/optical/mechanical systems. I eventually got
pretty good at it. To this day, just about the only mechanical things I
can fix are lawnmowers, Xerox machines, and computers.
Technical, non-technical, bah. These aren't words that should be
applied to people.
Mike O.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.